Fowler v. Potter et al

Filing 104

STIPULATION AND ORDER. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 10/7/08. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CSBN 443320 United States Attorney JOANN M. SWANSON (CSBN 88143) Chief, Civil Division MELISSA K. BROWN (SBN 203307) Assistant United States Attorney 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102-3495 Telephone: (415) 436-6962 Facsimile: (415) 436-6748 E-mail: melissa.k.brown@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Federal Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION CAROLYN V. FOWLER, Plaintiff, v. JOHN POTTER, Postmaster General for United States Postal Service, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 06-04716 SBA STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR ADMISSION OF TRIAL TESTIMONY OF MARY YOUNG Pretrial Conference Date: October 7, 2008 Time: 1:00 p.m. Ctrm: 3, 3rd Floor Trial Date: October 15, 2008 Time: 8:30 a.m Ctrm: 3, 3rd Floor WHEREAS, the trial deposition of Mary W. Young took place on July 15, 2008, in Los Angeles California, during which defendant conducted the direct and redirect of Mary Young, and plaintiff conducted the cross examination of Mary Young; WHEREAS, such deposition was transcribed by a certified court reporter and video taped by a certified videographer; WHEREAS, by and through their counsel, the parties plaintiff Carolyn Fowler and defendant John Potter, Postmaster General for United States Postal Service, agreed during the status conference held on July 30, 2008 before this Court that Mary Young was unavailable in accordance with the Federal Rules of Evidence and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and that STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR ADMISSION OF TRIAL TESTIMONY OF MARY YOUNG No. C 06-04716 SBA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR ADMISSION OF TRIAL TESTIMONY OF MARY YOUNG the parties could submit portions of Mary Young's testimony at trial; WHEREAS, pursuant to the parties' agreement on July 30, 2008, the Defendant hereby agrees to withdraw its Motion to Take Trial Deposition of Unavailable Witness Due to Medical Restriction or In Alternative To Allow Testimony via Video Conference; WHEREAS, both parties have designated portions of the deposition transcript in accordance with this Court's Order for Pretrial Preparation dated August 5, 2008; ACCORDINGLY, the parties by and through their undersigned counsel hereby stipulate that the deponent Mary Young is unavailable for trial within the meaning of rule 804(a) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, and that the parties may submit excerpts of the testimony given at her deposition on July 15, 2008 in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Federal Rules of Evidence. So Stipulated DATED: October 6, 2008 Respectfully submitted, JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney /s ________________________________ MELISSA K. BROWN Assistant United States Attorney /s Dated: October 6, 2008 _________________________________ TANYA MEYERS Attorney for Plaintiff No. C 06-04716 SBA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR ADMISSION OF TRIAL TESTIMONY OF MARY YOUNG ORDER Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the deponent Mary Young is unavailable for trial and that the parties may submit excerpts of the testimony given at her deposition on July 15, 2008 in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 43(a) and 45 (c)(3)(C) and the Federal Rules of Evidence 804 (a)(4) and other applicable Federal Rules of Evidence. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 10/7/08 ____________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Court Judge No. C 06-04716 SBA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?