Garrett v. Runnels

Filing 60

ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG denying 53 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 53 Motion to Reopen Case; terminating 57 Motion (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 WILLIAM RUSSELL GARRETT, ) ) Petitioner, ) v. ) ) D.L. RUNNELS, ) ) Respondent. ) __________________________________________ ) No. C 06-5182 SBA (pr) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL 16 17 The Court denied the petition in the above-titled matter, and entered judgment in favor of 18 Respondent on May 21, 2009. (See Docket Nos. 42 & 43.) This Court also denied Petitioner's 19 request for a certificate of appealability (see Docket No. 48), as has the Ninth Circuit Court of 20 Appeals (see Docket No. 51). 21 22 23 24 Petitioner now moves, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure ("FRCP") 60(b)(1), for reconsideration of the judgment and the order denying the petition because of mistakes made by the state and federal courts. (See Docket No. 53.) A motion brought pursuant to FRCP 60(b)(1) must be filed "no more than a year after the entry of judgment or order or date of proceeding." See FRCP 25 60(c)(1). 26 27 28 Petitioner's motion is untimely. Specifically, Petitioner filed the present motion on November 21, 2011, well more than a year after judgment was entered on May 21, 2009, and it is 1 therefore barred by the filing requirement set forth in FRCP 60(c)(1). Accordingly, Petitioner's 2 motion is DENIED. 3 Petitioner also has filed a motion for reasonable accommodations (Docket No. 57) which in 4 actuality is a motion for the appointment of counsel. In light of the fact that the Court has already 5 resolved this action, such request is moot. Alternatively, Petitioner has not otherwise made a 6 sufficient showing for the appointment of counsel. There is no right to counsel in habeas corpus 7 actions. See Knaubert v. Goldsmith, 791 F.2d 722, 728 (9th Cir. 1986). However, 18 U.S.C. 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 § 3006A(a)(2)(B) authorizes a district court to appoint counsel to represent a habeas petitioner whenever "the court determines that the interests of justice so require" and such person is financially unable to obtain representation. The decision to appoint counsel is within the discretion of the district court, see Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir. 1986), and should be granted only 12 when exceptional circumstances are present. See generally 1 J. Liebman & R. Hertz, Federal 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Habeas Corpus Practice and Procedure § 12.3b at 383-86 (2d ed. 1994). Petitioner has not shown that there are exceptional circumstances warranting appointment of counsel, and said motion is DENIED. This order terminates Docket Nos. 53 & 57. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: _3/13/12 _______________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 G:\PRO-SE\SBA\HC.06\Garrett182.recon.md.frm 2 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 WILLIAM RUSSELL GARRETT, 7 8 9 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. D.L. RUNNELS et al, Defendant. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Case Number: CV06-05182 SBA / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on March 13, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 16 17 18 20 William R. Garrett V-30110 California Men's Colony P.O. Box 8101 San Luis Obispo, CA 93409-8101 21 Dated: March 13, 2012 19 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Lisa Clark, Deputy Clerk 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 G:\PRO-SE\SBA\HC.06\Garrett182.recon.md.frm 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?