Payne v. Davis
Filing
19
***ERRONEOUS ENTRY, PLEASE IGNORE*** JUDGMENT, ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 5/11/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2009) Modified on 5/15/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ANDREW HARVEY,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) Petitioner, ) v. ) ) BEN CURRY, Warden, ) ) Respondent. ) __________________________________________ ) No. C 07-00204 SBA (pr) JUDGMENT
For the reasons stated in the Court's Order Denying the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, judgment is hereby entered in favor of Respondent. Each party shall bear his own costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 5/11/09 _______________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
G:\PRO-SE\SBA\HC.07\Harvey204.jud.md.frm
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GREGORY L. PAYNE, Plaintiff, v. B. CURRY et al, Defendant. /
Case Number: CV06-05310 SBA CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on May 14, 2009, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Gregory L. Payne D72559 PO Box 689 Soledad, CA 93960 Dated: May 14, 2009 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk
G:\PRO-SE\SBA\HC.07\Harvey204.jud.md.frm
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?