Apple Computer, Inc. v. Podfitness, Inc.

Filing 125

ORDER Setting Hearing on Motion 103 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment and Notice of Motion : Motion Hearing set for 6/17/2008 01:00 PM.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 5/14/08. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2008)

Download PDF
Apple Computer, Inc. v. Podfitness, Inc. Doc. 125 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A hearing on Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Podfitness' Partial Motion for Summary Judgment is currently scheduled for June 3, 2008. On May 12, 2008, citing their desire for additional time to negotiate settlement, the parties filed a stipulation to shorten the time required to serve Podfitness' Reply papers from May 20, 2008 to May 27, 2008. The parties also requested that the motion hearing date remain scheduled for June 3, 2008. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-3(c), any reply to an opposition must be served and filed by the moving party not less than 14 days before the hearing date. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that v. APPLE INC., Counterclaim Defendant / v. PODFITNESS, INC., and DOES 1-100, inclusive, Defendants. ________________________________________ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA APPLE INC., Plaintiff, Case No. C 06-5805 SBA ORDER [Docket Nos. 90 & 92] PODFITNESS, INC., Counterclaim Plaintiff Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Podfitness' Reply papers are due May 27, 2008 and the hearing scheduled for June 3, 2008 is continued to Tuesday, June 17, 2008, at 1:00 p.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 5/14/08 SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONGUnited States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?