Securities And Exchange Commission v. The Children's Internet, Inc. et al
ORDER FOR TEMPORARY CONTINUANCE OF CONTEMPT HEARING re 336 Order, Set Hearings, Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on May 4, 2010. (cwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On March 2, 2010, this Court issued an order denying Defendant Cort Poyner's third request to continue the hearing for contempt and set May 11, 2010 as the date for the hearing. On April 13, v. CHILDREN'S INTERNET INC., et al., Defendants. / SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, No. C 06-06003 CW ORDER FOR TEMPORARY CONTINUANCE OF CONTEMPT HEARING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2010, Thomas J. LoSavio, Mr. Poyner's attorney, filed a declaration stating that Mr. Poyner was hospitalized due to complications from a kidney transplant. Mr. LoSavio stated that Mr. Poyner was unable
to assist in his defense and was unaware of when he would be able to do so. Based on this information, the Court continues the hearing for contempt to July 13, 2010 at 9:00 am. At least two weeks before
the date of the hearing, Mr. Poyner shall notice and complete all depositions that he will use at the evidentiary hearing and shall provide to Plaintiff copies of any hearing exhibits, including
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
financial information and explanations for cash transfers that the Court previously ordered. Plaintiff must provide Mr. POyner with
copies of its exhibits, at least two weeks before the date of the hearing. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 4, 2010
CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?