Bridgelux, Inc. v. Cree, Inc. et al

Filing 112

STIPULATION AND ORDER POSTPONING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 111 Stipulation filed by Bridgelux, Inc. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 10/23/08. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2008)

Download PDF
1 Henry C. Bunsow (SBN 60707) K. T. Cherian (SBN 133967) 2 Robert F. Kramer (SBN 181706) Constance F. Ramos (SBN 203637) 3 Stephanie R. Johnson (SBN 242572) Ruhi Kumar (SBN 235945) 4 HOWREY LLP 525 Market Street, Suite 3600 5 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 848-4900 6 Facsimile: (415) 848-4999 Email: bunsowh@howrey.com 7 kramerR@howrey.com cheriank@howrey.com 8 ramosc@howrey.com johnsons@howrey.com 9 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant BRIDGELUX, INC. 11 Additional Attorneys Listed On Next Page 12 13 14 15 16 17 BRIDGELUX, INC., 18 19 20 vs. Plaintiff/CounterclaimDefendants, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C 06-06495 PJH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER POSTPONING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Date: N/A Time: N/A Courtroom: N/A Judge: Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton CREE, Inc., and 21 TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY, 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. C 06-06495 PJH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER POSTPOING FURTHER CMC DM_US:21544284_1 Defendants/CounterclaimPlaintiffs, 1 Matthew D. Powers (Bar No. 104795) Christopher J. Cox (Bar No. 151650) 2 Nicholas A. Brown (Bar No. 198210) 3 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP Silicon Valley Office 4 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, California 94065 5 Telephone: 650-802-3000 Facsimile: 650-802-3100 6 Email: matthew.powers@weil.com christopher.cox@weil.com 7 nicholas.brown@weil.com 8 9 David C. Radulescu (pro hac vice) Ryan R. Owens (pro hac vice) 10 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 11 767 Fifth Avenue New York, New York 10153 12 Telephone: 212-310-8000 Facsimile: 212-310-8007 13 Email: david.radulescu@weil.com ryan.owens@weil.com 14 15 Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs CREE, INC. AND TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. C 06-06495 PJH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER POSTPONING FURTHER CMC DM_US:21544284_1 -2- 1 Plaintiff and counterclaim-defendant Bridgelux, Inc. ("Bridgelux") and defendants and counterclaim2 plaintiffs Cree, Inc. and Trustees of Boston University (collectively "Cree") hereby stipulate and 3 respectfully request the Court continue the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for 4 October 30, 2008 at 2:30 p.m. The parties are continuing to make significant progress and a further 5 continuance will allow the parties to continue their settlement discussions without unnecessarily 6 consuming the Court's time. Consequently, the parties jointly propose that the dates for submitting the 7 Joint Case Management Statement and Case Management Conference be extend by at least five weeks8 to December 4th and 11th respectively. 9 // 10 // 11 // 12 // 13 // 14 // 15 // 16 // 17 // 18 // 19 // 20 // 21 // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 Case No. C 06-06495 PJH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER POSTPONING FURTHER CMC DM_US:21544284_1 -3- 1 SO STIPULATED this 22th day of October, 2008 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 10/23/08 DATED: ____________ PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X (b) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from K.T. Cherian and David C. Radulescu. By: //David C. Radulescu David C. Radulescu Attorneys for Defendants CREE, INC. and TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY By: //K.T. Cherian K.T. Cherian Attorneys for Plaintiff BRIDGELUX, INC. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ER N F D IS T IC T O R Case No. C 06-06495 PJH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER POSTPONING FURTHER CMC DM_US:21544284_1 -4- A C LI FO Ju llis J. H dge Phy amilton R NIA ________________________________ ERED Phyllis J. HamiltonSO ORD IT IS United States District Court Judge UNIT ED 19 S S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?