Bridgelux, Inc. v. Cree, Inc. et al

Filing 116

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 1/7/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2009)

Download PDF
1 Henry C. Bunsow (SBN 60707) K. T. Cherian (SBN 133967) 2 Robert F. Kramer (SBN 181706) Constance F. Ramos (SBN 203637) 3 Stephanie R. Johnson (SBN 242572) Ruhi Kumar (SBN 235945) 4 HOWREY LLP 525 Market Street, Suite 3600 5 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 848-4900 6 Facsimile: (415) 848-4999 Email: bunsowh@howrey.com 7 kramerR@howrey.com cheriank@howrey.com 8 ramosc@howrey.com johnsons@howrey.com 9 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant BRIDGELUX, INC. 11 Additional Attorneys Listed On Next Page 12 13 14 15 16 17 BRIDGELUX, INC., 18 19 20 vs. Plaintiff/CounterclaimDefendants, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C 06-06495 PJH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE Date: N/A Time: N/A Courtroom: N/A Judge: Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton CREE, Inc., and 21 TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY, 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. C 06-06495 PJH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendants/CounterclaimPlaintiffs, 1 Matthew D. Powers (Bar No. 104795) Christopher J. Cox (Bar No. 151650) 2 Nicholas A. Brown (Bar No. 198210) 3 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP Silicon Valley Office 4 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, California 94065 5 Telephone: 650-802-3000 Facsimile: 650-802-3100 6 Email: matthew.powers@weil.com christopher.cox@weil.com 7 nicholas.brown@weil.com 8 David C. Radulescu (pro hac vice) 9 Ryan R. Owens (pro hac vice) Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 10 767 Fifth Avenue 11 New York, New York 10153 Telephone: 212-310-8000 12 Facsimile: 212-310-8007 Email: david.radulescu@weil.com 13 ryan.owens@weil.com 14 Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs 15 CREE, INC. AND TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. C 06-06495 PJH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE -2- 1 Plaintiff and counterclaim-defendant Bridgelux, Inc. ("Bridgelux") and defendants and 2 counterclaim-plaintiffs Cree, Inc. and Trustees of Boston University (collectively "Cree") hereby 3 stipulate and respectfully request the Court enter an order as follows dismissing this action: 4 5 6 7 8 1. Pursuant to the terms of a confidential settlement agreement, all claims, counterclaims and affirmative defenses asserted by the parties in this action, and this action, shall be dismissed without prejudice. 2. Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees incurred in connection with this case. 9 SO STIPULATED this 30th day of December, 2008. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X (b) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of By: /s/ Robert F. Kramer Robert F. Kramer Attorneys for Plaintiff BRIDGELUX, INC. By: /s/ David Radulescu David C. Radulescu Attorneys for Defendants CREE, INC. and TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY 19 perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from David C. Radulescu. 20 21 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 22 24 25 26 27 28 UNIT ED 1/7/09 23 DATED: ____________ ER Case No. C 06-06495 PJH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE -3- N F D IS T IC T O R A C LI FO Ju llis J. H dge Phy amilton R NIA ________________________________ Phyllis J. Hamilton DERED United States T IS SO OR Judge District Court I S S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?