Sandeford v. Plummer et al

Filing 54

ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong GRANTING 53 Request for Extension of Time to File Dispositive Motion. Defendants Must File a Disposive Motion by no later than 12/01/09. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 10/21/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2009) Modified on 10/22/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Haapala, Thompson & Abern LLP Clyde A. Thompson, SBN 72920 Benjamin A. Thompson, SBN 236590 HAAPALA, THOMPSON & ABERN, LLP 1939 Harrison Street, Suite 800 Oakland, California 94612 Tel: 510-763-2324 Fax: 510-273-8570 Attorneys For Defendant ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT (municipal defendant) ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF CHARLES PLUMMER (supervisory defendant) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ­ OAKLAND NAPOLEON SANDEFORD, Plaintiff, vs. CHARLES PLUMMER, U. S. MARSHAL SERVICE, ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, AND UNKNOWN AGENTS, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: C06-06794 SBA ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE AND ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF CHARLES PLUMMER TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Attorneys At Law Park Plaza Building 1939 Harrison St., Suite 800 Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: 510-763-2324 Facsimile: 510-273-8570 Good cause appearing, Defendants Alameda County Sheriff's Office's and Alameda County Sheriff Charles Plummer's Request for Extension of Dispositive Motion Deadline, is GRANTED. No later than December 4, 2009, defendants must file and serve their dispositive motion, or notify the court that defendants are of the opinion that this case cannot be resolved by such a motion. In all other respects, the terms of the Court's September 1, 2009 Order Reviewing Amendment To The Complaint; Ordering Service Of Cognizable Claims; Dismissing Non-Cognizable Claims; And Addressing Pending Motions remain in effect. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 10/19/09 Saundra B. Armstrong United States District Judge 1 Sandeford v. Plummer, et al./Case #C06-06794 SBA [Proposed] Order Extending Time For Defendants Alameda County Sheriff's Office And Alameda County Sheriff Charles Plummer To File Dispositive Motion 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Haapala, Thompson & Abern LLP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NAPOLEON SANDEFORD, Plaintiff, v. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CHARLES PLUMMER et al, Defendant. / Attorneys At Law Park Plaza Building 1939 Harrison St., Suite 800 Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: 510-763-2324 Facsimile: 510-273-8570 Case Number: CV06-06794 SBA CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on October 21, 2009, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 2 Sandeford v. Plummer, et al./Case #C06-06794 SBA [Proposed] Order Extending Time For Defendants Alameda County Sheriff's Office And Alameda County Sheriff Charles Plummer To File Dispositive Motion 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Haapala, Thompson & Abern LLP Napoleon Sandeford 97606-011 United States Penitentiary (USP) Cornell Corrections 111 Taylor Street San Francisco, CA 94102 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: October 21, 2009 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk Attorneys At Law Park Plaza Building 1939 Harrison St., Suite 800 Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: 510-763-2324 Facsimile: 510-273-8570 3 Sandeford v. Plummer, et al./Case #C06-06794 SBA [Proposed] Order Extending Time For Defendants Alameda County Sheriff's Office And Alameda County Sheriff Charles Plummer To File Dispositive Motion

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?