McColm v. San Francisco Housing Authority et al

Filing 100

ORDER FOLLOWING RECEIPT OF PLAINTIFF'S "EMERGENCY EX PARTE REQUEST" FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY. This Order is related to 98 Order on Motion to Compel, signed by Judge Brazil on 01/08/09. (wdblc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PATRICIA A. MCCOLM Plaintiff, v. SAN FRANCISCO HOUSING AUTHORITY, et al. Defendants. ____________________________/ No. C 06-7378 CW (WDB) ORDER FOLLOWING RECEIPT OF PLAINTIFF'S "EMERGENCY EX PARTE REQUEST" FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY On January 14, 2009, the Court received a document entitled "EMERGENCY EX PARTE REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY ORDER, DEPOSITION CORRECTION AND FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING FOR MEDICAL IMPOSSIBILITY." Among other things, plaintiff requests the Undersigned to extend the deadline for completion of discovery. That deadline was set by District Judge Wilken. The Undersigned does not have the authority to extend it. Requests to extend that deadline must be presented directly to Judge Wilken. The Undersigned's chambers contacted defendants' counsel to determine whether she had received plaintiff's "Emergency Ex Parte Request" and, if so, how much time she would need to prepare and file a response. Defendants' counsel advised my chambers that she had not received the subject papers and knew nothing about the requests plaintiff was making. Assuming that she would receive plaintiff's papers by January 15, 2009, defendants' counsel requested to have until January 21, 2009, to file defendants' responsive papers. That request is GRANTED. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Chambers of the undersigned will contact the parties promptly after receiving defendants' responsive papers to determine how to proceed with respect to plaintiff's requests. The parties are reminded that, pursuant to Local Rules, they must appropriately meet and confer in good faith in order to attempt to resolve all discovery-related disputes before presenting those disputes to the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 14, 2009 cc: parties, CW, WDB WAYNE D. BRAZIL United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?