United States of America Ex Rel. et al v. Maxxam, Inc. et al

Filing 268

ORDER re 267 GRANTING STIPULATION Regarding Lodging of Proposed Trial Exhibits. Signed by Judge CLAUDIA WILKEN on 3/30/09. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JAMES J. BROSNAHAN (SBN 34555) JBrosnahan@mofo.com JAMES P. BENNETT (SBN 65179) JBennett@mofo.com EDGAR B. WASHBURN (SBN 34038) EWashburn@mofo.com ANDREW D. MUHLBACH (SBN 175694) AMuhlbach@mofo.com BRIAN J. MARTINEZ (SBN 224587) BrianMartinez@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: 415.268.7000 Facsimile: 415.268.7522 Attorneys for Defendants MAXXAM INC. and CHARLES E. HURWITZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. RICHARD WILSON and CHRIS MARANTO, Plaintiff, v. MAXXAM INC., a Delaware corporation; THE PACIFIC LUMBER COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; SCOTIA PACIFIC COMPANY LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; SALMON CREEK LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; CHARLES E. HURWITZ, an individual, Defendants. Case No. C-06-7497 CW (JCS) STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING LODGING OF PROPOSED TRIAL EXHIBITS Judge: Honorable Claudia Wilken Place: Courtroom 2, 4th Floor Complaint Filed: December 7, 2006 Trial Date: April 20, 2009 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING LODGING OF PROPOSED TRIAL EXHIBITS CASE NO. C-06-7497 CW (JCS) sf-2663946 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties and their respective counsel of record, Joseph C. Wilson, attorney for relators Richard Wilson and Chris Maranto on behalf of Plaintiff United States of America (collectively, "Plaintiff"), and Brian J. Martinez, attorney for Defendants MAXXAM Inc. and Charles Hurwitz (collectively, "Defendants"), that: WHEREAS, Paragraph 3(b) of this Court's Order for Pretrial Preparation provides that the parties shall lodge with the Court a set of pre-marked trial exhibits not less than 10 days prior to the Pretrial Conference; WHEREAS, the Pretrial Conference is scheduled for April 10, 2009; and WHEREAS, the parties require additional time to meet and confer and finalize their respective trial exhibits. NOW, THEREFORE, counsel for the parties hereby stipulate and request that the Court enter an order as follows: 1. The deadline for the parties to lodge their proposed trial exhibits with the Court shall be extended from March 31, 2009 to April 6, 2009. The parties respectfully request that the Court approve this Stipulation. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING LODGING OF PROPOSED TRIAL EXHIBITS CASE NO. C-06-7497 CW (JCS) sf-2663946 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: March 27, 2009 COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY By: /s/ Joseph C. Wilson Joseph C. Wilson Attorneys for Plaintiff THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. RICHARD WILSON and CHRIS MARANTO Dated: March 27, 2009 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: /s/ Brian J. Martinez Brian J. Martinez Attorneys for Defendants MAXXAM INC. and CHARLES E. HURWITZ I, Joseph C. Wilson, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order. Pursuant to General Order 45, I hereby attest that Brian J. Martinez has concurred in this filing. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING LODGING OF PROPOSED TRIAL EXHIBITS CASE NO. C-06-7497 CW (JCS) sf-2663946 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3/30/09 Dated: ____________________ HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge Northern District of California STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING LODGING OF PROPOSED TRIAL EXHIBITS CASE NO. C-06-7497 CW (JCS) sf-2663946 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?