Helio LLC v. Palm, Inc.

Filing 79

Proposed Order re 78 MOTION to Dismiss by Helio LLC. (Trock, Kevin) (Filed on 3/21/2007)

Helio LLC v. Palm, Inc.

Doc. 79

Case 4:06-cv-07754-SBA

Document 79

Filed 03/21/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 Deborah Bailey-Wells (114630, [e-mail]) Kevin C. Trock (161787, [e-mail]) 2 Harold H. Davis, Jr. (235552, [e-mail]) KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART PRESTON GATES ELLIS LLP 3 55 Second St., Suite 1700 4 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone [phone] Fax: [phone] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Attorneys for Plaintiff HELIO LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

HELIO, LLC, Plaintiff, vs. PALM INC. Defendant.

Case No. C 06-7754 SBA [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Case No. C 06-7754 SBA
Dockets.Justia.com

Case 4:06-cv-07754-SBA

Document 79

Filed 03/21/2007

Page 2 of 2

1

Having considered Plaintiff Helio LLC s Motion to Dismiss the Court finds that good

2 cause exists to dismiss this action without prejudice on the grounds that (1) Defendant Palm 3 Inc. has begun to wind down the advertising campaign that is the subject of this lawsuit; (2) 4 continuation of this litigation in light of Palm s decision would unnecessarily tax the 5 resources of the parties and this court; and (3) Palm will not be prejudiced as a result of this 6 dismissal. Fed. R. Civ. P., Rule 41(a)(2). 7 8 9 10 Dated:_____________________ 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

It is HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.

Hon.__________________________________ Judge Saundra B. Armstrong

Case No. C 06-7754 SBA