All American Semiconductor, Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. et al

Filing 349

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANTS ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. AND ELPIDA MEMORY (USA) re 348 Stipulation filed by Elpida Memory (USA), Inc., Elpida Memory, Inc., Elpida Memory (USA), Inc. and Elpida Memory, Inc. terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 4/30/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2009)

Download PDF
1 JAMES G. KREISSMAN (Bar No. 206740) jkreissman@stblaw.co m 2 HARRISON J. FRAHN IV (Bar No. 206822) hfrahn@stblaw.co m 3 JASON M. BUSSEY (Bar No. 227185) jbussey@stblaw.com 4 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 2550 Hanover Street 5 Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 251-5000 6 Facsimile: (650) 251-5002 7 Counsel for Defendants ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. and 8 ELPIDA MEMORY (USA) INC. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., et al., 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AS TO ELPIDA DEFENDANTS CASE NO. C 07-01200 PJH UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ALL AMERICAN SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., Plaint iff, v. Case No. C 07-01200 PJH Assigned for all purposes to the Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AS TO DEFENDANTS ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. AND ELPIDA MEMORY (USA) INC. Defendants. 1 The parties hereto hereby stipulate to a dismissal of this action as to defendants 2 Elpida Memory, Inc. and Elpida Memory (USA) Inc. with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2), 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. This dismissal shall not 4 apply to or affect any other defendant. 5 IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 6 Dated: April 29, 2009 7 8 9 10 11 12 Dated: April 29, 2009 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 30 Dated: April _____, 2009 By: /s/ Harrison J. Frahn IV Attorneys for Defendants ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. and ELPIDA MEMORY (USA) INC. BILZIN SUMBERG BAENA PRICE & AXELROD LLP By: /s/ Robert W. Turken Attorneys for Plaintiff ALL AMERICAN SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. ATTESTATION OF FILING Pursuant to General Order No. 45 X(B), I hereby attest that I have obtained concurrence in the filing of the stipulation from the parties listed above. By: /s/ Harrison J. Frahn IV [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________ED DER Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton SO OR IT IS United States District Judge h Judge P yllis J. H UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA amilton STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AS TO ELPIDA DEFENDANTS ER C CASE NO. C 07-01200 PJH N F D IS T IC T O 2 R H A LI FO R NIA RT U O NO RT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?