Edge Electronics, Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. et al

Filing 330

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANTS ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. AND ELPIDA MEMORY (USA) re 329 Stipulation, filed by Elpida Memory (USA), Inc., ELPIDA Memory, Inc., ELPIDA Memory, Inc. and Elpida Memory (USA), Inc. terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 3/24/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2009)

1 JAMES G. KREISSMAN (Bar No. 206740) [e-mail] m 2 HARRISON J. FRAHN IV (Bar No. 206822) [e-mail] m 3 JASON M. BUSSEY (Bar No. 227185) [e-mail] 4 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 2550 Hanover Street 5 Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 7 Counsel for Defendants ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. and 8 ELPIDA MEMORY (USA) INC. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., et al., 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AS TO ELPIDA DEFENDANTS CASE NO. C 07-01207

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION EDGE ELECTRONICS, INC., Plaint iff, v. Case No. C 07-01207 PJH Assigned for all purposes to the Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AS TO DEFENDANTS ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. AND ELPIDA MEMORY (USA) INC.

Defendants.

1

The parties hereto hereby stipulate to a dismissal of this action as to defendants

2 Elpida Memory, Inc., and Elpida Memory (USA) Inc. with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2), 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. This dismissal shall not 4 apply to or affect any other defendant. 5 IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP

6 Dated: March 20, 2009 7 8 9 10 11 12 Dated: March 20, 2009 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

By:

/s/ Harrison J. Frahn IV

Attorneys for Defendants ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. and ELPIDA MEMORY (USA) INC. BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP

By:

/s/ Douglas E. Spelfogel

Attorneys for Plaintiff EDGE ELECTRONICS, INC.

ATTESTATION OF FILING Pursuant to General Order No. 45 § X(B), I hereby attest that I have obtained

20 concurrence in the filing of the stipulation from the parties listed above. 21 22 23 24 [PROPOSED] ORDER
DISTR

By:

/s/ Harrison J. Frahn IV

24 26 Dated: March _____, 2009 27 28

UNIT ED

S

S 25 PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES IT IS SO ORDERED. ICT C TE TA

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AS TO ELPIDA DEFENDANTS ER C N CASE NO. C 07-01207 F D IS T IC T O R 2
H

A

LI

FO

IT I _ ________________S __________ Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton amilton United States Districte Phyllis J. H Judg Judge
NO

SO OR

DERED

R NIA

RT U O

RT