Baxter Healthcare Corporation et al v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings Inc. et al

Filing 251

ORDER re 239 Stipulation, filed by Fresenius Medical Care Holdings Inc., Baxter International Inc., Baxter Healthcare SA,Fresenius USA Inc., Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deka Products Limited Partnership. Signed by Judge James Larson on 1/12/09. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2009)

Download PDF
Case 3:07-cv-01359-PJH Document 239 Filed 12/29/2008 Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 David K. Callahan, P.C. (IL 620227) dcallahan@kirkland.com KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 200 East Randolph Drive Chicago, Illinois, 60601 Telephone: 312-861-2000 Facsimile: 312-861-2200 Attorney For Plaintiff and Counter-defendant BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC., and BAXTER HEALTHCARE SA Maureen K. Toohey (SBN 196401) mtoohey@tooheylaw.com TOOHEY LAW GROUP LLC 225 Franklin Street, 16th Floor Boston, Massachusetts 02110 Telephone: (617) 748-5511 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-defendant DEKA PRODUCTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Juanita R. Brooks (SBN 75934) jbrooks@fr.com FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 12390 El Camino Real San Diego, CA 92130 Telephone: (858) 678-5070 Facsimile: (858) 678-5099 Attorneys for Defendants and Counter-claimants FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. AND FRESENIUS USA, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC., BAXTER HEALTHCARE SA, AND DEKA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiffs and Counter-defendants, vs. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., d/b/a FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE NORTH AMERICA, and FRESENIUS USA, INC., Defendants and Counter-claimants. STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANTS SUPPLEMENTATION OF RESPONSES TO BAXTER INTERROGATORY NOS. 6, 7, AND 13 Case No. C 07-01359 PJH (JL) "DISCOVERY MATTER" STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANTS SUPPLEMENTATION OF RESPONSES TO BAXTER INTERROGATORY NOS. 6, 7, AND 13 Judge: Location: Hon. James Larson Courtroom F, 15th Floor Case 3:07-cv-01359-PJH Document 239 Filed 12/29/2008 Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 record: WHEREAS, pursuant to this Court's December 12, 2008, Order (Dkt. No. 229) the parties have prepared a Joint Stipulation regarding Defendants' agreement to provide "exactly the same information sought by Plaintiffs' motion" (Dkt. No. 219), NOW, THEREFORE, it is stipulated by the respective parties and their counsel of Defendants will provide the names and locations of all clinics to which Defendants refer to in their supplemental responses to Baxter Interrogatory Nos. 6 and 7; Defendants will provide all revenue and sales data for every allegedly acceptable noninfringing alternative Defendant product; Defendants will either definitively state that they will not assert that the products they identified were "acceptable" prior to 2006 or Defendants will produce the revenue and sales data for every year that Defendants allege that each alleged acceptable alternatives was indeed acceptable; and Defendants agree to supplement all Interrogatory Responses necessary to comply with this Court's Order and this stipulation by January 12, 2009. STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANTS SUPPLEMENTATION OF RESPONSES TO BAXTER INTERROGATORY NOS. 6, 7, AND 13 1 Case No. C 07-01359 PJH (JL) Case 3:07-cv-01359-PJH Document 239 Filed 12/29/2008 Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANTS SUPPLEMENTATION OF RESPONSES TO BAXTER INTERROGATORY NOS. 6, 7, AND 13 December 29, 2008 By: /s/ David K. Callahan_____________ KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP David K. Callahan, P.C. (IL 620227) Garret Leach (pro hac vice) Mary Zaug (pro hac vice) 200 East Randolph Chicago, Illinois, 60601 Telephone: 312-861-2000 Facsimile: 312-861-2200 Robert G. Krupka (SBN 196625) 777 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: 213-680-8400 Facsimile: 213-680-8500 Kenneth Bridges (SBN 243541) 555 California Street San Francisco, California, 94104 Telephone: 415-439-1400 Facsimile: 415-439-1500 Attorney For Plaintiff and Counter-defendant BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC., and BAXTER HEALTHCARE SA December 29, 2008 By: /s/ Michael A. Amon___ Juanita R. Brooks (SBN 75934) Todd G. Miller (SBN 163200) Michael M. Rosen (SBN 230964) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 12390 El Camino Real San Diego, CA 92130 Telephone: (858) 678-5070 Facsimile: (858) 678-5099 Mathias W. Samuel (pro hac vice) Michael E. Florey (pro hac vice) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 60 South Sixth Street, Suite 3300 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: (612) 335-5070 Facsimile: (612) 288-9696 Limin Zheng (SBN 226875) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 500 Arguello Street, Suite 400 Redwood City, CA 94053 Telephone: (650) 839-5070 Facsimile: (650) 839-5071 Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. AND FRESENIUS USA, INC. 2 Case No. C 07-01359 PJH (JL) Case 3:07-cv-01359-PJH Document 239 Filed 12/29/2008 Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, that within ten days of this Order, Defendants will: (1) provide the names and locations of all clinics to which Defendants refer to in their supplemental responses to Baxter Interrogatory Nos. 6 and 7; (2) provide all revenue and sales data for every allegedly acceptable non-infringing alternative Defendant product; and (3) either definitively state that they will not assert that the products they identified were "acceptable" prior to 2006 or produce the revenue and sales data for every year that Defendants allege that each alleged acceptable alternatives was indeed acceptable. January 12 9 DATED: ________________, 200__ ___________________________________ JAMES LARSON Chief Magistrate Judge STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANTS SUPPLEMENTATION OF RESPONSES TO BAXTER INTERROGATORY NOS. 6, 7, AND 13

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?