Dram Claims Liquidation Trust v. Hynix Semiconductor , Inc. et al
Filing
424
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANTS ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. AND ELPIDA MEMORY (USA) re 423 Stipulation filed by Elpida Memory Inc., Elpida Memory USA Inc., Elpida Memory Inc. and Elpida Memory USA Inc. terminated.. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 3/24/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2009)
1 JAMES G. KREISSMAN (Bar No. 206740) jkreissman@stblaw.co m 2 HARRISON J. FRAHN IV (Bar No. 206822) hfrahn@stblaw.co m 3 JASON M. BUSSEY (Bar No. 227185) jbussey@stblaw.com 4 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 2550 Hanover Street 5 Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 251-5000 6 Facsimile: (650) 251-5002 7 Counsel for Defendants ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. and 8 ELPIDA MEMORY (USA) INC. 9 10 11 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION Case No. C 07-01381 PJH Assigned for all purposes to the Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AS TO DEFENDANTS ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. AND ELPIDA MEMORY (USA) INC.
DRAM CLAIMS LIQUIDATION TRUST, by 14 its Trustee, WILMINGTON TRUST FSB, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., et al., Defendants. Plaintiff,
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AS TO ELPIDA DEFENDANTS CASE NO. C 07-01381
1
The parties hereto hereby stipulate to a dismissal of this action as to defendants
2 Elpida Memory, Inc., and Elpida Memory (USA) Inc. with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2), 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. This dismissal shall not 4 apply to or affect any other defendant. 5 IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
6 Dated: March 20, 2009 7 8 9 10 11 12 Dated: March 20, 2009 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
By:
/s/ Harrison J. Frahn IV
Attorneys for Defendants ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. and ELPIDA MEMORY (USA) INC. LINDQUIST & VENNUM, P.L.L.P.
By:
/s/ James M. Lockhart
Attorneys for Plaintiff DRAM CLAIMS LIQUIDATION TRUST
ATTESTATION OF FILING Pursuant to General Order No. 45 § X(B), I hereby attest that I have obtained
20 concurrence in the filing of the stipulation from the parties listed above. 21 22 23 24 [PROPOSED] ORDER
TA
By:
/s/ Harrison J. Frahn IV
25 PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES IT IS SO ORDERED.ISTRICT SD TE C
RT U O
UNIT ED
24 26 Dated: March _____, 2009 27 28
S
ER STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AS TO ELPIDA DEFENDANTS C N F CASE NO. C 07-01381 D IS T IC T O R 2
A
LI
FO
O T IS __ _________________I___SO _____ Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton milton y United States District JJudgellis J. Ha udge Ph
NO
RDERE
D
R NIA
RT
H
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?