Dram Claims Liquidation Trust v. Hynix Semiconductor , Inc. et al

Filing 424

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANTS ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. AND ELPIDA MEMORY (USA) re 423 Stipulation filed by Elpida Memory Inc., Elpida Memory USA Inc., Elpida Memory Inc. and Elpida Memory USA Inc. terminated.. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 3/24/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2009)

1 JAMES G. KREISSMAN (Bar No. 206740) [e-mail] m 2 HARRISON J. FRAHN IV (Bar No. 206822) [e-mail] m 3 JASON M. BUSSEY (Bar No. 227185) [e-mail] 4 SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 2550 Hanover Street 5 Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 7 Counsel for Defendants ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. and 8 ELPIDA MEMORY (USA) INC. 9 10 11 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION Case No. C 07-01381 PJH Assigned for all purposes to the Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AS TO DEFENDANTS ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. AND ELPIDA MEMORY (USA) INC.

DRAM CLAIMS LIQUIDATION TRUST, by 14 its Trustee, WILMINGTON TRUST FSB, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., et al., Defendants. Plaintiff,

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AS TO ELPIDA DEFENDANTS CASE NO. C 07-01381

1

The parties hereto hereby stipulate to a dismissal of this action as to defendants

2 Elpida Memory, Inc., and Elpida Memory (USA) Inc. with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2), 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. This dismissal shall not 4 apply to or affect any other defendant. 5 IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP

6 Dated: March 20, 2009 7 8 9 10 11 12 Dated: March 20, 2009 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

By:

/s/ Harrison J. Frahn IV

Attorneys for Defendants ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. and ELPIDA MEMORY (USA) INC. LINDQUIST & VENNUM, P.L.L.P.

By:

/s/ James M. Lockhart

Attorneys for Plaintiff DRAM CLAIMS LIQUIDATION TRUST

ATTESTATION OF FILING Pursuant to General Order No. 45 § X(B), I hereby attest that I have obtained

20 concurrence in the filing of the stipulation from the parties listed above. 21 22 23 24 [PROPOSED] ORDER
TA

By:

/s/ Harrison J. Frahn IV

25 PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES IT IS SO ORDERED.ISTRICT SD TE C
RT U O
UNIT ED

24 26 Dated: March _____, 2009 27 28

S

ER STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AS TO ELPIDA DEFENDANTS C N F CASE NO. C 07-01381 D IS T IC T O R 2

A

LI

FO

O T IS __ _________________I___SO _____ Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton milton y United States District JJudgellis J. Ha udge Ph
NO

RDERE

D

R NIA

RT

H