Dram Claims Liquidation Trust v. Hynix Semiconductor , Inc. et al

Filing 436

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG AND INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA CORP. re 434 Stipulation filed by Dram Claims Liquidation Trust. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 12/4/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2009)

~. .

1

James P. McCarthy (pro hac vice)
Michael Olafson (pro hac vice)

2
3

James M. Lockhart (pro hac vice) DeAnne M. Hilgers (pro hac vice)
John C. Ekman (pro hac vice)

4
5

6
7
8

Lindquist & Vennum P.L.L.P. 4200 IDS Center 80 South 8th Street Minneapolis, MN 55402
Telephone: [phone]

Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

9

10
11

Email: [e-mail]

12
13

James J. Ficenec (SBN -152172) Sellar Hazard Manning Ficenec & Lai 1800 Sutter Street, Ste. 460 Concord, CA 94520
Telephone: [phone]

14
15

Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

16 17
18

Counsel for Plaintiff, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19 DRAM Claims Liquidation Trust, by its Trustee,
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,

Case No.: C07-0138l-PJH

20
21

Plaintiff,
v.

22

Hynix Semiconductor, et a1.,
23

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND (PROPOSED) ORDER AS TO INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG AND INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA CORP.

24
25

Defendants.+

26
27 28
Stipulation of Dismissal as to Infineon Defendants

C07-0I38I-PlH
Doc# 3081630\1

I.~

1

STIPULATION
The Parties hereto hereby stipulate to a dismissal ofthis action as to defendants Infineon
Technologies AG and Infineon Technologies North America Corp., with prejudice, pursuant to Rule
41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of

2
3

4

Civil Procedure. This stipulation is pursuant to a settlement

5

6 agreement negotiated by the Parties, and the Parties agree that the Court should reserve jurisdiction to
7 enforce the terms of

that settlement agreement. Each Party shall bear its own costs and attorney's

8 fees. This dismissal shall not apply to or affect any other defendant in this action. The dismissal is
9 without prejudice to Plaintiffs' right to enforce the terms of

the Settement Agreement.

10
11

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

12
13

Dated: December 2, 2009

LINDQUIST & VENNUM P.L.L.P.

14
15

By: lsi James P. McCarthy James P. McCarthy

16
17

Attorneys for Plaintiff
DRAM CLAIMS LIQUIDATION TRUST

18 19

Dated: December 2, 2009

KAYE SCHOLER LLP

20

By: lsi Julian Brew
21

Julian Brew

22
23

Attorneys for Defendants INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA CORP.

24
25

26 27
28
2
Stipulation of Dismissal as to Infineon Defendants

C07-0l381-PlH
Doc# 3081630\1

L

1

ATTESTATION OF FILING
Pursuant to General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that I have obtained concurrence in the
filing of this document from the parties listed above.

2
3

4
5

6
7
8

lsi James P. McCarthy
James P. McCarthy

9
10
11

12
13

14
15

16

17
18

19

20
21

22
23

24
25

26 27
28
3 Stipulation of Dismissal as to Infineon Defendants C07-0l381-PlH
Doc# 3081630\1

I, i

i,
I"
i

1

(PROPOSED) ORDER
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERED.

L

t:f

2
3

r.~..~ .

..::

4
5

UNIT ED

Dated: 12/4/09

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

0"

".:;

'~;:

6
7
8

LI

FO

hyllis Judge P

J. Hami

lton

R NIA

O T n. SO IHoIS Phyllis J. Hamilton United States District Judge

RDERE

D

RT U O

0~

,-;:

NO

RT

10
11

N

F D IS T IC T O R

A

9

,~'

ER

H

C

",4

0-,

;J'

12
13

14
15

16
17
18

19

20
21

22
23
i

24
25

00" ".

26
27 28 4
Stipulation of Dismissal as to Infineon Defendants

C07-0l38I-PlH
Doc# 3081630\1