Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 1012

ORDER re: proposed judgment. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 12/14/2010. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2010) Modified on 12/15/2010 (kk, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al Doc. 1012 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. SAP AG, et al., Defendants. _______________________________/ The court is in receipt of Oracle's proposed judgment, SAP's statement regarding the proposed form of judgment, and Oracle's response to SAP's statement regarding the proposed form of judgment. The court is unwilling to enter judgment in a piecemeal fashion. If all Oracle is seeking to conclude the case is the relief set forth in the proposed judgment, and not resolution of any of the other matters indicated in SAP's response, such as injunctive relief, Oracle should so advise the court. SAP may have one week to respond to any statement filed by Oracle. Once it is clear to the court what is at issue, the court will issue any necessary scheduling order. ORACLE USA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, No. C 07-1658 PJH ORDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 14, 2010 ______________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?