Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 1164

ORDER re pretrial filings. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 5/18/2012. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2012) Modified on 5/21/2012 (vlk, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 ORACLE USA, INC., et al., 9 Plaintiffs, v. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 SAP AG, et al., 12 No. C 07-1658 PJH Defendants. _____________________________/ ORDER 13 14 The court has reviewed some of the pretrial filings, and it is apparent that some will 15 need to be revised, given the denial of Oracle’s motions for clarification/reconsideration. 16 Since no evidence relating to the hypothetical license measure of damages will be 17 permitted at the upcoming trial, the exhibit lists and witness lists (at a minimum) must be 18 revised. The revised papers should be filed prior to the pretrial conference, if possible, but 19 in any event no later than two weeks from the date of this order. 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: May 18, 2012 23 24 25 26 27 28 ______________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?