Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al
ORDER. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 11/2/2009. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. SAP AG, et al., Defendant(s). _______________________________/ The court has today approved a number of sealing requests filed by the parties. The purpose of this order is to advise the parties that they should not assume, by virtue of the court's approval of plaintiffs' request permitting them to file under seal defendants' information supporting their opposition to defendants' motion for partial summary judgment, that the same or similar excerpts will be sealed, or that the court will close the courtroom, if they are offered or discussed at trial. The court permits the sealing at this juncture largely because the amount of any licenses is not pertinent to the motion under consideration. ORACLE USA, INC., et al., Plaintiff(s), No. C 07-1658 PJH ORDER RE SEALING REQUESTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 2, 2009 ______________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?