Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 749

ORDER re Pretrial Submissions. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 8/6/2010. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2010) Modified on 8/9/2010 (vlk, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al Doc. 749 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ORACLE CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SAP AG, et al., Defendants. _______________________________/ The court has briefly reviewed the discussions in the trial briefs and in the joint pretrial statement, filed August 5, 2010, regarding the parties' efforts to streamline the case for trial. The court is presently in the process of preparing the order regarding the submitted motions for summary judgment, which were heard on May 5, 2010, and, in light of some of the representations in the pretrial papers, as well as SAP's August 5, 2010 press release, requires some clarification regarding whether SAP's concessions or proposed concessions will obviate the need for the court to decide any of the issues raised in the summary judgment motions. Accordingly, no later than Tuesday, August 10, 2010, the parties shall submit a joint statement advising the court which if any of the matters at issue in the summary judgment motions have been resolved by the parties and need not be addressed by the court. In addition, it appears from the pretrial submissions that the parties are having some difficulty reaching agreement as to how best to streamline the case for trial. If the parties are unable to accomplish this on their own, the court will require that they meet with a No. C 07-1658 PJH ORDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Magistrate Judge. Depending on availability, the court will refer the matter to either Judge Spero or Judge Laporte, or, if the parties prefer, to either Judge Ryu or Judge Beeler of the Oakland court. The parties shall indicate their preference in the August 10, 2010 joint statement. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 6, 2010 ______________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?