Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 807

ORDER re 806 Letter filed by Oracle International Corporation, Oracle USA Inc., Oracle EMEA Limited, Siebel Systems, Inc.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on August 24, 2010. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2010)

Download PDF
Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al Doc. 807 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On August 23, 2010, the parties filed a letter requesting leave to file certain discovery motions on August 31, 2010 for hearing on October 5, 2010. This request comes almost nine months after the discovery cutoff date and only approximately two months before trial. The parties' letter reserves the right to raise the issue of the timeliness of the motions pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-8. Accordingly, prior to the Court's decision on whether the parties may file these motions, the parties shall file a joint statement explaining why they believe that these proposed motions are timely under Local Rule 7-8. Further, it is unclear from the parties' letter whether there will be a motion to compel, but to the extent applicable, the parties shall also address timeliness pursuant to Civil Local Rule 26-2. The joint statement shall be no longer than ten pages and shall be filed no later than September 1, 2010. If the Court decides to permit the parties to file the proposed motions, it may decide to set a shortened briefing schedule for hearing on the motions on October 5, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 24, 2010 ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE United States Magistrate Judge v. SAP AG, et al., Defendants. / ORACLE CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, No. C-07-01658 PJH (EDL) ORDER REQUIRING JOINT STATEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?