Dilley v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al

Filing 75

DISCOVERY ORDER re 68 Letter filed by Marianne Dilley, 74 Discovery Hearing,. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 12/4/08. (mejlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 As to interrogatory No. 1 regarding years 2002-2004, the parties are ordered to meet and confer and within 30 days of the filing of this order, reach a stipulation as to the relative increase in referrals from MetLife to NMR for the period of 2002-2007. As to interrogatory No. 5, within thirty days of the filing of this order, MetLife shall provide plaintiff with the number of claims it has accepted or granted and rejected or denied after a review by a physician retained through NMR from 2005 to 2007. The court will deny without prejudice, upon a showing of good cause, the plaintiff's request for claims for the period from 2002-2004. vs. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; BANK OF AMERICA LONG TERM DISABILITY BENEFITS PLAN, Defendants. / MARIANNE DILLEY, Plaintiffs, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. C 07-1831 PJH (MEJ) ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DISPUTE UNIT ED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. S S DISTRICT TE C TA Dated: December 4, 2008 ER N F D IS T IC T O R 2 A C LI _____________ s n Jame MARIA-ELENA aJAMES aria-Ele Judge M Magistrate Judge United States FO R NIA O ORD IT IS S ERED RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?