Perez v. Rumi Construction et al

Filing 57

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 12/17/2008. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 17, 2008 __________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge JOSE EDGAR PEREZ, Plaintiff, v. RUMI CONSTRUCTION, et al., Defendants. ___________________________________/ The court having been advised by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James following a settlement conference, that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice; however, if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with proof of service of a copy thereof to the opposing party, within sixty (60) days from the date of this order, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be restored to the Court's calendar to be set for trial. If no certification is filed, after passage of sixty (60) days, the dismissal shall be with prejudice. No. C 07-2039 PJH ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?