Xiaoning et al v. Yahoo! Inc, et al

Filing 30

Proposed Order re Motion for an Early Case Management Conference and Order by Wang Xiaoning, Shi Tao, Yu Ling. (Myers, Roger) (Filed on 6/29/2007) Modified on 7/2/2007 (cp, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Xiaoning et al v. Yahoo! Inc, et al Doc. 30 Case 4:07-cv-02151-CW Document 30 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION WANG XIAONING, YU LING, SHI TAO, and ADDITIONAL PRESENTLY UNNAMED AND TO BE IDENTIFIED INDIVIDUALS, Plaintiffs, v. YAHOO, INC., a Delaware Corporation, YAHOO! HOLDINGS (HONG KONG), LTD., a Foreign Subsidiary of Yahoo!, ALIBABA.COM, INC. a Delaware Corporation, AND OTHER PRESENTLY UNNAMED AND TO BE IDENTIFIED INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYEES OF SAID CORPORATIONS, Defendants. Case No. C07-02151 CW [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR AN EARLY CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Date: July 2 or 26, 2007 (Proposed) Time: TBD Location: Courtroom 2 Judge: Hon. Claudia Wilken Having considered Defendants' Motion For An Early Case Management Conference And Order, the papers filed in response thereto, as well as all other arguments and the entire record in this case, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' Motion For An Early Case Management Conference and Order is DENIED, without the necessity for scheduling a Motions Hearing on either of the dates proposed by the Defendants. All matters and issues raised by the Defendants in their Motion, and all other matters associated with the case management process shall be addressed according to the schedule set by the Court in its June 19, 2007 Order. SIGNED on the _____ day of __________________, 2007. By: The Honorable Claudia Wilken Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of California [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR AN EARLY CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. C07-02151 CW Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?