Xiaoning et al v. Yahoo! Inc, et al

Filing 75

Proposed Order re 73 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction by Yahaoo! Holdings (Hong Kong), Ltd.. (Petrocelli, Daniel) (Filed on 8/27/2007) Modified on 8/28/2007 (cp, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Xiaoning et al v. Yahoo! Inc, et al Doc. 75 Case 4:07-cv-02151-CW Document 75 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C07-02151 CW [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MOT. TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION WANG XIAONING, YU LING, SHI TAO, and ADDITIONAL PRESENTLY UNNAMED AND TO BE IDENTIFIED INDIVIDUALS, Plaintiff, v. YAHOO! INC., a Delaware Corporation, YAHOO! HONG KONG LIMITED, a Foreign Subsidiary of Yahoo! Inc., AND OTHER PRESENTLY UNNAMED AND TO BE IDENTIFIED INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYEES OF SAID CORPORATIONS, Defendant. Case No. C07-02151 CW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS YAHOO! HONG KONG LIMITED FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION Hon. Claudia Wilken Having considered Defendant Yahoo! Hong Kong Limited's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction ("the Motion"), the papers filed in response thereto, all other argument, and the entire record in this case, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is: Case 4:07-cv-02151-CW Document 75 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C07-02151 CW [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MOT. TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL GRANTED _____, Defendant Yahoo! Hong Kong Limited is hereby DISMISSED for lack of personal jurisdiction. DENIED _____. SIGNED on the ______ day of ____________________________, 2007. ______________________________________ The Honorable Claudia Wilken Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of California -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?