Xiaoning et al v. Yahoo! Inc, et al
Filing
92
Proposed Order re 90 MOTION to Initiate Initial and Jurisdictional Discovery by Wang Xiaoning, Shi Tao, Yu Ling. (Myers, Roger) (Filed on 9/14/2007) Modified on 9/17/2007 (cp, COURT STAFF).
Xiaoning et al v. Yahoo! Inc, et al
Doc. 92
Case 4:07-cv-02151-CW
Document 92
Filed 09/14/2007
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION WANG XIAONING, YU LING, SHI TAO, and ADDITIONAL PRESENTLY UNNAMED AND TO BE IDENTIFIED INDIVIDUALS, Plaintiffs, v. YAHOO, INC., a Delaware Corporation, YAHOO! HONG KONG LTD., a Foreign Subsidiary of Yahoo!, AND OTHER PRESENTLY UNNAMED AND TO BE IDENTIFIED CORPORATE DEFENDANTS AND UNNAMED AND TO BE IDENTIFIED INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYEES OF SAID CORPORATIONS, Defendants. Case No. C07-02151 CW
TORT DAMAGES CLAIM
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO INITIATE INITIAL AND JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY Judge Claudia Wilken
Having considered Plaintiffs' Motion to Initiate Initial and Jurisdictional Discovery, the papers filed in response thereto, all other arguments, and the entire record in this case, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is: GRANTED: _____, with the content of the Plaintiffs' Proposed Discovery Plan to be considered and amended, as necessary, at the consolidated hearing on the motion to dismiss, discovery and case management matters to be held on November 1, 2007. DENIED: _____, with the Plaintiffs' Response to the Defendants' Motions to Dismiss and associated Motions due 14 days after the date of this Order, and the Defendants' reply due 21 days thereafter. SIGNED on the ______ day of ____________________, 2007
_____________________________________ The Honorable Claudia Wilken Judge, United States District Court For the Northern District of California
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 4:07-cv-02151-CW
Document 92
Filed 09/14/2007
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?