Kinstley et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 80

ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, DENYING 76 Motion to Stay (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2008) Modified on 12/23/2008 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: 12/19/08 SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge IT IS SO ORDERED. THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARIA LEE KINSTLEY and KENNETH R. KINSTLEY, Plaintiffs, v. CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, CITY OF PLEASANT HILL, and DIANNE KENNEY, Defendants. / Case No. 07-02323 SBA ORDER [Docket No. 76] Before the Court is the Plaintiffs' "3rd Request for Stay." For the reasons discussed in the conference call which occurred December 19, 2008, at 3:00 p.m., with plaintiffs and defense counsel, the Court DENIES the request to stay the action. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KINSTLEY ET AL et al, Plaintiff, v. CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL et al, Defendant. / Case Number: CV07-02323 SBA CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on December 22, 2008, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. Maria Lee Kinstley P.O. Box 126 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 Dated: December 22, 2008 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?