Kinstley et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 89

STIPULATION AND ORDER: That the City of Pleasant Hill is dismissed from this action with prejudice. Each party to bear their own fees and costs with regard to this dismissed Defendant. City of Pleasant Hill terminated. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 1/29/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2009) Modified on 2/2/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

1 2 3 4 5 6
McNAMARA, DODGE, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, PFALZER, BORGES & BROTHERS LLP

JAMES V. FITZGERALD, III (State Bar No. 55632) NOAH G. BLECHMAN (State Bar No. 197167) MCNAMARA, DODGE, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, PFALZER, BORGES & BROTHERS LLP 1211 Newell Avenue Post Office Box 5288 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant City of Pleasant Hill UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7 8 9 10
ATTORNEYS AT LAW P.O. BOX 5288, WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596 TELEPHONE: [phone]

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

MARIA LEE KINSTLEY Plaintiff, vs. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, CITY OF PLEASANT HILL, DIANNE KENNEY, Defendants.

Case No. C07-2323 SBA MEJ STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT CITY OF PLEASANT HILL, WITH PREJUDICE, PER FRCP 41(A)(1)__ Trial Date: September 14, 2009

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties to this action, through Plaintiff in pro per MARIA KINSTLEY and Defendant CITY OF PLEASANT HILL's respective counsel of record, and approved by the Court in the accompanying Order, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), Defendant CITY OF PLEASANT HILL is hereby dismissed from this action, with prejudice, each party to bear their own fees and costs with regard to this dismissed Defendant. IT IS SO STIPULATED.

///
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT CITY OF PLEASANT HILL - Case No. C07-2323 SBA MEJ

1 2 3 4 5 6
McNAMARA, DODGE, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, PFALZER, BORGES & BROTHERS LLP

Dated: January ___, 2009

PLAINTIFF IN PRO PER

By:

Maria Kinstley, Plaintiff in Pro Per

Dated: January 23, 2009

MCNAMARA, DODGE, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, PFALZER, BORGES & BROTHERS LLP

7 8 9 10
ATTORNEYS AT LAW P.O. BOX 5288, WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596 TELEPHONE: [phone]

By:

James V. Fitzgerald, III Noah G. Blechman Attorneys for Defendant City of Pleasant Hill

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 1/29/09

________________________________________ Honorable Sandra Brown Armstrong United States District Court Judge

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT CITY OF PLEASANT HILL - Case No. C07-2323 SBA MEJ

2

1 2 3 4 5 6
McNAMARA, DODGE, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, PFALZER, BORGES & BROTHERS LLP

NO OBJECTION BY DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO AND DIANE KENNY Defendant City and County of San Francisco and Diane Kenny have no objection to Plaintiff MARIA KINSTLEY's dismissal of the CITY OF PLEASANT HILL, with prejudice.

7 8 9 10
ATTORNEYS AT LAW P.O. BOX 5288, WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596 TELEPHONE: [phone]

Dated: January 26, 2009 By:

SAN FRANCISCO CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE

/s/ Robert A. Bonta Robert A. Bonta Attorneys for Defendant City and County of San Francisco and Diane Kenny

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT CITY OF PLEASANT HILL - Case No. C07-2323 SBA MEJ

3