In re Lakusta

Filing 3

JUDICIAL REFERRAL FOR PURPOSE OF DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP OF CASES. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 6/21/07. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2007)

Download PDF
In re Lakusta Doc. 3 Case 4:07-cv-03085-SBA Document 3 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Appellant Alexis Mager has filed two other bankruptcy appeals in the Northern District of California: Lakusta v. Evans, case number C 06-6105 PJH and Lakusta v. United States Bankruptcy Trustee, case number C 07-0227 WHA. On January 12, 2007, a clerk's notice that case numbers C 06-3431 SBA and C 06-6105 PJH are not related was entered in both cases. On June 14, 2007, an order of referral was issued to determine if case number C 07-0227-WHA is related to case number C 06-6105 PJH. That order of referral is still pending. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE: ALEXIS MAGER LAKUSTA, Debtor, Appellant. ___________________________________ IN RE: ALEXIS MAGER LAKUSTA, Debtor, Appellant. / No. C. 06-3431 SBA No. C 07-3085 CW JUDICIAL REFERRAL FOR PURPOSE OF DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP OF CASES Pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-12(c), this Court, sua sponte, refers the above-captioned case to District Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong to consider whether these cases are related.1 Parties shall file Dockets.Justia.com Case 4:07-cv-03085-SBA Document 3 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 any response in opposition to or in support of relating the cases within five (5) days of receipt of this Order. Dated 6/21/07 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge cc: SBA 2 Case 4:07-cv-03085-SBA Document 3 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE: ALEXIS MAGER LAKUSTA, Case Number: CV07-03085 CW CV06-03431 SBA CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on June 21, 2007, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. U.S. Bankruptcy Court, No. District of CA (San Francisco) Clerk's Office 235 Pine Street P.O. Box 7341 San Francisco, CA 94120-7341 U.S. Trustee Office of the U.S. Trustee/SF 235 Pine Street San Francisco, CA 94104 Alexis Mager Lakusta 1259 El Camino Real #245 Menlo Park, CA 94025 Catherine Schlomann Robertson Pahl & Gosselin 225 W. Santa Clara St. Suite 1500 San Jose, CA 95113 Charles E Sims 4225 Solano Ave., Box 738 Napa, CA 94558 David Duperrault 25 Metro Drive Suite 600 San Jose, CA 95110 James Robert Roberts and Elliott LLP Ten Almaden Blvd Case 4:07-cv-03085-SBA Document 3 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Suite 500 San Jose, CA 96113 Kathleen Joan Moorhead 100 N. Wiget Lane Suite 150 Walnut Creek, CA 94598 Sharon E. LaFountain 13651 Saratoga-Synnyvale Road Saratoga, CA 95070 Thomas E. Carlson USBC-San Francisco 235 Pine St P.O. Box 7341 San Francisco, CA 94104 Wayne Silver 333 W. El Camino Real Sunnyvale, CA 94807 Aron Mark Oliner Duane Morris, LLP One Market Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94105 Dated: June 21, 2007 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Sheilah Cahill, Deputy Clerk 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?