Armstrong v. Brusco Tug & Barge Inc. et al
ORDER DISMISSING CASE, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 11/6/08. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2008)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. BRUSCO TUG AND BARGE, Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the court that they have agreed to a settlement of this cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause of action is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this court, within ninety (90) days, with proof of service thereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. If no certification is filed, after passage of ninety (90) days, the dismissal shall be with prejudice. The pretrial conference and trial date are VACATED. DAVID ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff(s), No. C 07-3273 PJH ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 6, 2008 ______________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?