Speedtrack, Inc. v. Office Depot, Inc. et al

Filing 68

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS/SUMMARY JUDGMENT re 67 Stipulation filed by Speedtrack, Inc. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 7/16/13. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN, P.C.
RODERICK G. DORMAN (SBN 96908)
[e-mail]
ALAN P. BLOCK (SBN 143783)
[e-mail]
MARC MORRIS (SBN 183728)
[e-mail]
865 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2900
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7
8

Attorneys for Plaintiff,
SPEEDTRACK, INC.

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION

13
lawyers
los angeles, california

McKool Smith Hennigan, P.C.

12

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
OFFICE DEPOT, INC.; CDW CORPORATION; )
NEWEGG, INC.; CIRCUIT CITY STORES,
)
INC.; PC CONNECTION, INC.; COMPUSA, )
INC.
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
SPEEDTRACK, INC.,

Case No. C-07-3602 PJH
JOINT STIPULATION RE: BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS/SUMMARY
JUDGMENT AND ORDER
Time: N/A
Date: N/A
Ctrm: Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton

23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. C-07-3602 PJH
904675

JOINT STIPULATION RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS/SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

JOSHUA J. POLLACK (SBN 215922)
PROSKAUER ROSE LLP
2049 Century Park East
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3206
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
STEVEN M. BAUER (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
PROSKAUER ROSE LLP
One International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for
OFFICE DEPOT, INC.; CDW CORPORATION;
NEWEGG INC.; and PC CONNECTION, INC.

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2CASE NO. C-07-3602 PJH
904675

JOINT STIPULATION RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS/SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s Civil Minutes following the Case Management

2

Conference of June 27, 2013 (Doc. 60), the parties have met and conferred regarding the briefing

3

schedule for Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss/Summary Judgment related solely to res judicata and

4

collateral estoppel issues pertaining to the effect of the outcome of the case of SpeedTrack, Inc. v.

5

Walmart.com USA, LLC, C-06-7336 PJH on this Action (“Motion to Dismiss/Summary Judgment”).

6

NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff SpeedTrack and Defendants Office Depot, Inc., CDW

7

Corporation, Newegg, Inc., and PC Connection, Inc., by and through their respective counsel,

8

hereby stipulate to the following briefing schedule for Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss/Summary

9

Judgment:

10

EVENT

11

Defendants file their Motion to Dismiss/Summary
Judgment

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

lawyers
los angeles, california

September 2, 2013

Last day for SpeedTrack to file opposition to
Motion to Dismiss/Summary Judgment

18

August 23, 2013

Last day for SpeedTrack to complete any
depositions noticed by SpeedTrack

17

August 22, 2013

Last day for Defendants to produce documents,
answers, and computer files in response to the
discovery requested by SpeedTrack

16

August 20, 2013

Parties to jointly request assistance of Magistrate
Judge to resolve any open issues, including any of
Defendants’ objections to SpeedTrack’s discovery
requests

15

August 16, 2013

Last day for parties to meet and confer to discuss
scope of SpeedTrack’s discovery requests

14

August 9, 2013

Last day for Defendants to serve objections to
identify discovery disputes

13

August 2, 2013

Last day for SpeedTrack to serve discovery requests
on Defendants limited solely to issues raised in
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss/Summary
Judgment. Those discovery requests shall be
limited to document requests and notices of
deposition.

12
McKool Smith Hennigan, P.C.

Date

September 19, 2013

26
27
28

-1CASE NO. C-07-3602 PJH
904675

JOINT STIPULATION RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS/SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1

Last day for Defendants to complete any depositions September 30, 2013
of any witness/expert who submits a declaration in
support of SpeedTrack’s opposition to the
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss/Summary Judgment

2
3
4

Last day for Defendants to file reply to Motion to
Dismiss/Summary Judgment

5
6

October 17, 2013

SO STIPULATED.

7
8

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

DATED: July 12, 2013

9
MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN, P.C.
10
11

By

12

/s/ Alan P. Block _______________
ALAN P. BLOCK

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF,
SPEEDTRACK, INC.

13
14
15

DATED: July 12, 2013

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
PROSKAUER ROSE, LLP.

16
17

By
18
19

/s/ Steven M. Bauer _____________
STEVEN M. BAUER

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS,
OFFICE DEPOT, INC.
CDW CORPORATION
NEWEGG, INC.
PC CONNECTION, INC.

20
21
22

RT

26

Hamilton

A

H

ER

hyllis J.

7/16/13

R NIA

Judge P

ERED

FO

NO

25

O ORD
IT IS S

LI

UNIT
ED

24

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

23

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

27
28

-2CASE NO. C-07-3602 PJH
904675

JOINT STIPULATION RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS/SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

2
The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing
3
document has been served on July 12, 2013 to all counsel of record who are deemed to have
4
consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system. Any other counsel of record will
5
be served by electronic mail, facsimile, U.S. Mail and/or overnight delivery.
6
7
/s/ Yoshie Botta
Yoshie Botta

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-3CASE NO. C-07-3602 PJH
904675

JOINT STIPULATION RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS/SUMMARY JUDGMENT