Ekdahl v. Ayers

Filing 25

JUDGMENT, ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 12/12/08. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EMIL JOSEPH WILHELM EKDAHL, III, ) ) Petitioner, ) v. ) ) ROBERT AYERS, Warden, ) ) Respondent. ) _________________________________________ ) No. C 07-03642 SBA (PR) JUDGMENT For the reasons stated in the Court's Order Denying the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus on All Claims and Addressing Pending Motions, judgment is hereby entered in favor of Respondent. Each party shall bear his own costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 12/12/08 _______________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 P:\PRO-SE\SBA\HC.07\Ekdahl3642.jud.frm 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. AYERS et al, Defendant. / UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EMIL JOSEPH WILHELM EKDAHL III, Plaintiff, Case Number: CV07-03642 SBA CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on December 12, 2008, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. Emil J.W. Ekdahl C-79199 San Quentin State Prison 1 Main Street San Quentin, CA 94974 Dated: December 12, 2008 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk P:\PRO-SE\SBA\HC.07\Ekdahl3642.jud.frm 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?