Kirola et al v. City & County of San Francisco, The et al

Filing 582

ORDER RE POST-TRIAL BRIEFING. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 5/5/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2011)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5

OAKLAND DIVISION

6
7

IVANA KIROLA, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

8
9

Case No: C 07-03685 SBA
ORDER RE POST-TRIAL
BRIEFING

vs.

10

THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
11 FRANCISCO, et al.,
12

Defendants.

13
14
15
16
17

To assist the Court in its resolution of the instant matter, the parties shall submit
post-trial briefs and revised, proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law as follows:
1.

By no later than May 26, 2011 by 5:00 p.m., the parties shall simultaneously

18

file post-trial memoranda, not to exceed twenty-five (25) pages in length, demonstrating

19

why judgment should be entered in their favor. By no later than June 16, 2011 by 5:00

20

p.m., the parties shall simultaneously file their responses to the opening memoranda, not to

21

exceed fifteen (15) pages in length. All arguments shall be supported by appropriate legal

22

authority, including pinpoint citations, if applicable. With regard to any factual matters, the

23

memoranda also shall include supporting page/line citations to the Reporter’s Transcript

24

(“RT”) from the trial, as well as any exhibits admitted into evidence. The parties shall

25

submit to chambers, binders with copies of all exhibits to which they refer in their

26

memoranda. With respect to Plaintiffs’ brief, Plaintiffs must include the specific relief they

27

are seeking, the factual support and the legal authority establishing that the Court has the

28

1

ability to afford the particular relief being requested. The memoranda must comply with

2

Civil Local Rule 7-4.

3

2.

The parties’ opening memoranda shall be accompanied by revised proposed

4

findings of fact and conclusions of law, which shall not exceed forty (40) pages, and shall

5

include specific citations to legal authority, the record and the exhibits. The revised

6

proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law shall be e-filed and a courtesy copy of the

7

same shall be emailed to the Court’s proposed orders email box, preferably in Microsoft

8

Word.

9
10
11
12

3.

Upon completion of the above submissions, the Court will review the matter

and will notify the parties in the event it determines that oral argument is necessary.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 5, 2011

______________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-