Kirola et al v. City & County of San Francisco, The et al

Filing 661

ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong Granting 660 Stipulation. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Guy B. Wallace, State Bar No. 176151 Mark T. Johnson, State Bar No. 76904 SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KONECKY LLP 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 421-7100 Facsimile: (415) 421-7105 Email: gwallace@schneiderwallace.com mjohnson@schneiderwallace.com James C. Sturdevant, State Bar No. 94551 THE STURDEVANT LAW FIRM A Professional Corporation 354 Pine Street, Fourth Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 477-2410 Facsimile: (415) 477-2420 Email: jsturdevant@sturdevantlaw.com 12 13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 OAKLAND DIVISION 17 18 IVANA KIROLA, et al., Plaintiffs, 19 20 21 vs. THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (“the CITY”), et al.; 22 23 No. 4:07-CV-03685 SBA CLASS ACTION STIPULATION ON REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE JOINT STATEMENT RE FURTHER PROCEEDINGS; [PROPOSED] ORDER Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION ON REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE JOINT STATEMENT RE: FURTHER PROCEEDINGS; [PROPOSED] ORDER KIROLA ET AL. V. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL., CASE NO. 4:07-CV-03685 SBA 1 STIPULATION 2 WHEREAS, by its Order of March 20, 2014, (Dkt. No. 659 – “the Order), this Court 3 directed the parties to meet and confer and to file a joint statement regarding what, if any, 4 additional briefing, submission of evidence and/or further court proceedings are necessary and 5 appropriate for the final resolution of this action and to further meet and confer regarding potential, 6 further motion practice or supplemental briefing on specific issues; 7 8 WHEREAS, the Order required that the parties’ Joint Statement Re Further Proceedings described above be filed by no later than April 11, 2014; 9 WHEREAS, the parties promptly engaged in the meet and confer process required by the 10 Order by engaging in comprehensive discussions on Friday, March 21 and Monday, March 22, 11 2014. During those discussions each side described its positions, to the extent they were then 12 developed, on each of the issues raised by the Order; 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 WHEREAS, following the meet and confer process, it was agreed by the parties that the City would prepare an initial draft of the Joint Statement, including those sections setting forth its positions that differed from Plaintiffs’ positions, after which Plaintiffs would review and add to the draft; WHEREAS, counsel for the City were not able to complete the preparation and internal review of an initial draft of the Joint Stipulation until April 7, 2014 due, in part, to the need to complete work on an appellate brief that was due on April 1, 2014 in the matter of Anderson v. City & County of San Francisco, Cal. Court App., First Appellate Dist., Case No. A138856. WHEREAS, Mark Johnson, one of the two attorneys for Plaintiffs involved in the meet and confer process and the preparation Plaintiffs’ portion of the Joint Statement, will be out of the office for personal reasons and unable to devote any time to this project for the period of April 9 through April 11, 2014; WHEREAS, the parties anticipate that further meet and confer efforts may be appropriate 26 once a draft of the Joint Statement containing the positions of both parties has been prepared; 27 28 STIPULATION ON REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE JOINT STATEMENT RE: FURTHER PROCEEDINGS; [PROPOSED] ORDER KIROLA ET AL. V. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL., CASE NO. 4:07-CV-03685 SBA 1 1 2 3 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have proposed, and Defendants do not oppose, a one week extension of the deadline for filing the Joint Statement, to and including April 18, 2014; THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated, subject to the approval of the Court, that date by 4 which the Joint Statement Re: Further Proceedings be extended by one week, so that it is filed by 5 no later than April 18, 2014. 6 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 7 Dated: April 7, 2014 8 SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KONECKY LLP /s/ MARK JOHNSON Counsel for Plaintiffs 9 10 11 12 Dated: April 7, 2014 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY /s/ _ JAMES M. EMERY Counsel for Defendants 13 14 15 16 17 ORDER Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 18 Joint Stipulation Re: Further Proceedings that is the subject of the Court’s Order of March 20, 19 20 21 22 23 2014 (Dkt. No. 659), which was previously required to be filed by no later than April 11, 2014, may be filed by no later than April 18, 2014. All other terms of the Court’s Order of March 20, 2014 are unchanged. 7 DATED: April ___, 2014 24 25 _______________________________________ 26 SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge 27 28 STIPULATION ON REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE JOINT STATEMENT RE: FURTHER PROCEEDINGS; [PROPOSED] ORDER KIROLA ET AL. V. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL., CASE NO. 4:07-CV-03685 SBA 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?