Preston v. United States of America et al

Filing 73

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ALL REMAINING CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE re 72 Stipulation filed by United States of America. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 9/9/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TONY WEST Assistant Attorney General JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney R. MICHAEL UNDERHILL Attorney in Charge, West Coast Office Torts Branch, Civil Division JEANNE M. FRANKEN Trial Attorneys Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice 7-5395 Federal Bldg., P.O. Box 36028 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, California 94102-3463 Telephone: (415) 436-6644 E-mail: jeanne.franken@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Defendant & Third-Party Plaintiff United States of America UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION KARI PRESTON, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BAE SYSTEMS SF SHIP REPAIR, INC., and DOES 1 through 10, Inclusive, Defendants. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Cross-Claimant, v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 Civil No. C-07-3861-PJH IN ADMIRALTY STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF ALL REMAINING CLAIMS, WITH PREJUDICE DISMISSAL Case No. C 07-3861 PJH 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BAE SYSTEMS SAN FRANCISCO SHIP REPAIR, INC., Cross-Defendant. BAE SYSTEMS SAN FRANCISCO SHIP REPAIR, INC., Cross-Claimant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Cross-Defendant, BAE SYSTEMS SAN FRANCISCO SHIP REPAIR, INC., Cross-Claimant, v. SEACOAST ELECTRONICS, INC., Cross-Defendant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. SEACOAST ELECTRONICS, INC., Third-Party Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WHEREFORE, the parties hereto having informed the Court that all claims herein, by and againt all parties hereto, have been fully compromised, and A consent judgment having been entered against the United States of America as part of that compromise, and said judgment now having been satisfied, and 2 Case No. C 07-3861 PJH DISMISSAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The parties hereto having requested that the case, and all remaining claims and actions therein, be dismissed, with prejudice, it is therefore, ORDERED that all remaining claims and actions shall be, and the same hereby are, dismissed, with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs. It is so ORDERED this 9th day of September UNIT ED , 2009 at San Francisco, California. RT U O S S DISTRICT TE C TA ER N F D IS T IC T O R We hereby request and consent to the entry of the foregoing Dismissal, with Prejudice: Dated: September 8 , 2009 TONY WEST Assistant Attorney General JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney R. MICHAEL UNDERHILL Attorney in Charge, West Coast Office Torts Branch, Civil Division s/Jeanne M. Franken JEANNE M. FRANKEN Trial Attorneys Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice Attorneys for Defendant & Third-Party Plaintiff United States of America /// /// /// DISMISSAL 3 A C LI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE FO Judge P hyllis J. Hamilto n R NIA IT IS S O ORD ERED NO RT H Case No. C 07-3861 PJH 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: July 17 , 2009 Law Offices of Lyle C. Cavin, Jr. s/Christopher Goodroe CHRISTOPHER GOODROE Attorneys for Plaintiff Kari Preston Dated: July 17 , 2009 Buty & Curliano LLP s/Madeline L. Buty MADELINE L. BUTY Attorneys for Defendant and Third-party Plaintiff Bae Systems SF Ship Repairs, Inc. Dated: July 17 , 2009 Burnham Brown s/Ronnie R. Gipson RONNIE R. GIPSON Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant Seacoast Electronics, Inc. CERTIFICATION OF SIGNATURES I attest that the content of the document is acceptable to all persons required to sign the document. s/Jeanne M. Franken JEANNE M. FRANKEN DISMISSAL 4 Case No. C 07-3861 PJH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?