Russell v. Wells Fargo and Company

Filing 91

ORDER re 90 granting STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE OR INVALIDATE RULE 68 OFFERS. Motion Hearing set for 5/7/2009 02:00 PM.. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 3/4/09. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 T. JOSEPH SNODGRASS (MN# 231071) (pro hac vice) Email: jsnodgrass@larsonking.com KELLY A. SWANSON (MN# 330838) (pro hac vice) Email: kswanson@larsonking.com LARSON KING, LLP 2800 Wells Fargo Place 30 East 7th Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Telephone: (651) 312-6500 Facsimile: (651) 312-6619 Attorneys for Plaintiff MONTE RUSSELL GLENN L. BRIGGS (SB# 174497) Email: gbriggs@hbwllp.com THERESA A. KADING (SB# 211469) Email: tkading@hbwllp.com HODEL BRIGGS WINTER LLP 8105 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 1400 Irvine, CA 92618 Telephone: (949) 450-8040 Facsimile: (949) 450-8033 Attorneys for Defendants WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; WELLS FARGO & COMPANY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ­ OAKLAND DIVISION MONTE RUSSELL, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, Defendants. CASE NO. C 07-03993 CW JUDGE CLAUDIA WILKEN COURTROOM 2 STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE OR INVALIDATE RULE 68 OFFERS; ORDER APPROVING EXTENSION Plaintiff Monte Russell ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo & Company ("Defendants"), through their respective counsel, pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, hereby stipulate as follows: 36085_1 STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 36085_1 WHEREAS, on September 11, 2008, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Motion and Motion to Strike or Otherwise Invalidate Defendant's Rule 68 Offers of Judgment ("Motion"); WHEREAS, on September 30, 2008, Plaintiff filed an Amended Notice of Motion and Motion to Strike or Otherwise Invalidate Defendant's Rule 68 Offers of Judgment, setting the hearing date on the Motion for December 11, 2008; WHEREAS, on November 20, 2008 this Court approved the parties' stipulation seeking a continuation of the hearing date to January 8, 2009; WHEREAS, on December 23, 2008, this Court approved the parties' stipulation seeking a continuation of the hearing date to February 19, 2009; WHEREAS, on January 30, 2009, this Court approved the parties' stipulation seeking a continuation of the hearing date to March 5, 2009. WHEREAS, the parties are continuing to engage in extensive and thorough settlement negotiations and have halted discovery and other litigation pending settlement negotiations; and WHEREAS, the parties wish to conserve their and the Court's resources in the event that a settlement is reached. // // // // -2STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 36085_1 NOW, THEREFORE, through their respective counsel, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The hearing on Plaintiff's Motion is continued from March 5, 2009, to May 7, 2009, at 2 p.m. 2. The deadline for Defendants to file a response to Plaintiff's Motion shall be measured from the continued hearing date. DATED: March 2, 2009 LARSON KING, LLP T. JOSEPH SNODGRASS KELLY A. SWANSON By: /s/ T. JOSEPH SNODGRASS T. JOSEPH SNODGRASS Attorneys for Plaintiff MONTE RUSSELL DATED: March 2, 2009 HODEL BRIGGS WINTER LLP GLENN L. BRIGGS THERESA A. KADING By: /s/ THERESA A. KADING THERESA A. KADING Attorneys for Defendants WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; WELLS FARGO & COMPANY -2STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 36085_1 ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3/4 , 2009 CLAUDIA WILKEN DISTRICT COURT JUDGE -2STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?