Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. v. Anpec Electronics Corp.

Filing 75

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 10/30/08. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2008)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

David M. Barkan (CA Bar No. 160825/[e-mail]) Rajesh Bagga (CA Bar No. 248837/[e-mail]) Fish & Richardson P.C. 500 Arguello Street Redwood City, CA 94063 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 650-839-5071 Joseph V. Colaianni, Jr. (Admitted pro hac vice/[e-mail]) Fish & Richardson P.C. 1425 K Street NW, Suite 1100 Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC. Ming-Tao Yang (CA Bar No. 221295/[e-mail]) FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRET & DUNNER, LLP 3300 Hillview Drive Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E. Robert Yoches (Admitted pro hac vice/ [e-mail]) FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRET & DUNNER, LLP 900 New York Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20001-4412 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant ANPEC ELECTRONICS CORP. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC. Plaintiff, v. ANPEC ELECTRONICS CORP. Defendant.

Case No. 07-CV-04424-PJH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF CASE WITH PREJUDICE

1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF CASE W I T H PREJUDICE Case No. 07-CV-04424-PJH

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By:

Pursuant to the parties' confidential settlement agreement executed on October 9, 2008, Plaintiff Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., and Defendant Anpec Electronics Corp., by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate and move for an order dismissing the abovecaptioned case, including all claims and counterclaims, with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii). The parties further stipulate that each party shall be responsible for its own costs and attorneys fees related to this action. DECLARATION Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from David M. Barkan, counsel for Plaintiff.

Dated: October 28, 2008 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

Dated: October 28, 2008 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRET & DUNNER, LLP By: /s/ Ming-Tao Yang Ming-Tao Yang

/s/ David M. Barkan David M. Barkan

Attorneys for Plaintiff MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.

Attorneys for Defendant ANPEC ELECTRONICS CORP.

ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that all claims and counterclaims in this case are dismissed with prejudice.

UNIT ED

October 30 Dated: _______________, 2008

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

2

ER

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF CASE W I T H PREJUDICE Case No. 07-CV-04424-PJH

N

F D IS T IC T O R

A

C

LI

FO

hyllis Judge P

J. Hami

lton

R NIA

OO HonorabIS Phyllis J. Hamilton IT le S United States District Judge

RDERE

D

RT U O

NO

RT

H