Williams v. Williams

Filing 110

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken DENYING 107 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUCCESSIVE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

ISAIAH NOEL WILLIAMS,

9

No. C 07-4464 CW

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING
MOTION FOR LEAVE
TO FILE SUCCESSIVE
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION (Docket No.
107)

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

v.

11

D. WILLIAMS,

12

Defendant.
________________________________/

13
14

Defendant D. Williams moves for leave to file a successive

15

motion for summary judgment.

16

the motion.

17

Plaintiff Isaiah Williams opposes

Because Defendant seeks to raise essentially the same

18

arguments that she raised in her previous summary judgment motion,

19

her request for leave to file a second summary judgment motion is

20

denied.

21

evidence or recent case law that would disturb the Court’s prior

22

summary judgment ruling.

23

to offer an “expanded record” with her second summary judgment

24

motion, Def.’s Mot. 3, this record -- which consists mostly of

25

Defendant’s own deposition testimony -- remains in conflict with

26

much of Plaintiff’s evidence.

27

another summary judgment motion would not resolve any disputes of

28

material fact or meaningfully advance this litigation.

Defendant has not identified any newly discovered

See Docket No. 82.

While she proposes

As such, allowing Defendant to file

1
2
3

Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion for leave to
file a successive summary judgment motion (Docket No. 107).
IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5
6

Dated: 1/17/2013

CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2