Williams v. Williams

Filing 125

ORDER re 124 MOTION that the Court consider striking improperly filed paper re 122 Response ( Non Motion ) filed by Isaiah Noel Williams (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 2/22/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 Northern District of California 10 San Francisco Division ISAIAH N. WILLIAMS, 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 No. C 07-04464 CW (LB) Plaintiff, v. 13 ORDER RE: MOTION FILED AT ECF NO. 124. 14 D. WILLIAMS, 15 16 Defendant. _____________________________________/ 17 The parties have filed back-and-forth individual letters about discovery disputes (even though 18 the court requires joint letters). Now Plaintiff filed (at 7:27 p.m. on a Friday night) an individual 19 administrative motion to strike part of one of those letters currently pending before the undersigned 20 (even though all discovery matters are referred to the undersigned). 21 Under all of the circumstances (including the referral to the undersigned, everyone’s failure to 22 comply with the procedures, and a hearing set for next Thursday, February 28, 2013 at 11:30 a.m.), 23 the undersigned strongly urges Plaintiff to withdraw its motion to strike. The court sees no upside in 24 forcing a reply in a short time period given the pending hearing, and the parties need to try to work 25 things out here first before bothering the district court. That is the nature of a referral. 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 22, 2013 _______________________________ LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge 28 C 07-04464 CW (LB) ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?