Williams v. Williams

Filing 130

ORDER re discovery dispute about expert deadlines and compliance with 3/1/13 order (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 3/11/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

Northern District of California

10

San Francisco Division
ISAIAH N. WILLIAMS,

12
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

No. C 07-04464 CW (LB)

Plaintiff,
v.

13
D. WILLIAMS,
14
15

Defendant.
_____________________________________/

16

The undersigned held a discovery telephone conference on March 11, 2013 to address the

17

parties’ dispute about expert discovery. The parties agreed to extend expert discovery deadlines,

18

and the court held that there was good cause to do so (given the logistics issues attached to the

19

court’s March 1, 2013 order). The court orders the following:

20
21
22

1. As soon as possible, and no later than March 18, 2013, CDCR through counsel will provide
the court and Plaintiff with a firm time frame for responding to the court’s March 1 order.
2. The new discovery deadlines are as follows:

23

Rebuttal expert disclosures:

April 5, 2013

24

Expert discovery completion:

May 6, 2013

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 11, 2013
_______________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge

27
28

C 07-04464 CW (LB)