Williams v. Williams
Filing
192
ORDER Regarding Telephone Access. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 7/2/2013. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2013)
Case4:07-cv-04464-CW Document188-2 Filed07/01/13 Page1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
EUGENE ILLOVSKY (SBN 117892),
EIllovsky@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
755 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Phone: (650) 813-5600
Facsimile: (925) 377-7710
WHITNEY E. MCCOLLUM (SBN 253039),
WMcCollum@mofo.com
MATTHEW CHIVVIS (SBN 251325),
MChivvis@mofo.com
GABRIELLE R. HOLBURT (SBN 278985),
GHolburt@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP,
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: (415) 268-7000
Facsimile: (415) 268-7522
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ISAIAH NOEL WILLIAMS
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
ISAIAH NOEL WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,
17
18
v.
19
Case No. C 07-04464 CW (LB)
[PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING TELEPHONE
ACCESS
D. WILLIAMS,
20
Defendant.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. C 07-04464 CW (LB)
sf-3304203
1
Case4:07-cv-04464-CW Document188-2 Filed07/01/13 Page2 of 2
1
Plaintiff, Isaiah Noel Williams, CDC # K-33769, is confined at Pelican Bay State Prison
2
in the custody of Greg Lewis, Warden, and is not permitted telephone access without a Court
3
order. In order for Plaintiff to be able to prepare for trial in the above captioned matter, which is
4
currently scheduled for July 18, 2013, Plaintiff should be permitted limited telephone access with
5
his Court-appointed counsel.
6
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that:
7
The Warden arrange for Plaintiff, Isaiah Noel Williams, CDC # K-33769, to have access
8
to a telephone for two, sixty-minute telephone conversations with his Court-appointed counsel
9
before July 18, 2013.
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
7/2/2013
Dated: ______________
13
___________________________
JUDGE CLAUDIA WILKEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. C 07-04464 CW (LB)
sf-3304203
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?