Plascencia et al v. Lending 1st Mortgage et al

Filing 348

ORDER GRANTING IN PART EMC MORTGAGE CORPORATIONS 347 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL PAGES AND THE PARTIES 345 STIPULATION FOR RELIEF FROM THE CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE.Cross Motions/Responses due by 7/13/2012. Replies due by 7/27/2012. Repli es due by 8/9/2012. Motion Hearing set for 8/23/2012 02:00 PM before Hon. Claudia Wilken. Case Management Statement due by 8/16/2012. Further Case Management Conference set for 8/23/2012 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 6/26/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2012)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 6 ARMANDO PLASCENCIA; and MELANIA PLASCENCIA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 7 v. 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 LENDING 1ST MORTGAGE; LENDING 1ST MORTGAGE, LLC; EMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION; and DOES 1-10, Defendants. 11 12 No. C 07-4485 CW ORDER GRANTING IN PART EMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL PAGES AND THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION FOR RELIEF FROM THE CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE (Docket Nos. 345 and 347) ________________________________/ Having considered Defendant EMC Mortgage Corporation’s motion 13 14 to exceed twenty-five pages in its motions for summary judgment 15 and to decertify the class, Plaintiffs Armando and Melania 16 Plascencia’s opposition thereto and the parties’ stipulation to 17 change the briefing and hearing schedule for dispositive motions, 18 the Court finds good cause to modify the case management order and 19 set the following schedule for these motions: 20 21 Event Date 22 Deadline for Plaintiffs to file their motion for summary judgment, in a brief of thirty pages or less. Friday, June 29, 2012 Deadline for Defendants to file their crossmotions for summary judgment, motions to decertify the class and opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. The motions and opposition shall be addressed in a single brief of sixty pages or less. To the extent possible, Defendants shall file a single joint brief on behalf of more than one, or all, Friday, July 13, 2012 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 Defendants, with separate sections to address individual differences as needed. Deadline for Plaintiffs to file their reply in support of their motion for summary judgment and their oppositions to Defendants’ cross-motions. The reply and oppositions shall be addressed in the same brief of thirty pages or less. Friday, July 27, 2012 Deadline for Defendants to file their replies in support of their cross-motions for summary judgment and motions to decertify the class. The reply brief shall not exceed fifteen pages. To the extent possible, Defendants shall file a single joint brief on behalf of more than one, or all, Defendants, with separate sections to address individual differences as needed. Thursday, August 9, 2012 Deadline for the parties to file a joint case management conference statement. Thursday, August 16, 2012 Hearing on motions for summary judgment and to decertify class, and further case management conference. Thursday, August 23, 2012 at 2:00 p.m. The Court will entertain a stipulation to change the briefing 15 schedule, provided that opposing briefs are filed in series as 16 described above, not contemporaneously, with as little repetition 17 as possible, and that the parties’ briefing is completed at least 18 two weeks prior to the hearing date. 19 The final pretrial conference is currently scheduled for 20 October 22, 2012, and the five day jury trial in this matter is 21 set to begin on November 5, 2012. 22 parties’ stipulation to change the date for the dispositive motion 23 hearing, the Court notes that the dates for the final pretrial 24 conference and trial may need to be continued. 25 Because the Court grants the IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: 6/26/2012 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?