Stiener et al v. Apple, Inc. et al

Filing 86

Letter from AT&T Mobility LLC re: plaintiffs non-opposition to motion for leave to file reply brief. (Falk, Donald) (Filed on 4/28/2008)

Download PDF
Stiener et al v. Apple, Inc. et al Doc. 86 Mayer Brown LLP Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, California 94306-2112 April 28, 2008 BY ELECTRONIC FILING The Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong United States District Court for the Northern District of California 1301 Clay Street, Suite 400S Oakland, CA 94612-5212 Re: Stiener v. Apple, Inc. et al., No. 4:07-cv-04486-SBA Main Tel (650) 331-2000 Main Fax (650) 331-2060 www.mayerbrown.com Donald M. Falk Direct Tel (650) 331-2030 Direct Fax (650) 331-4530 dfalk@mayerbrown.com Dear Judge Armstrong: I represent defendant AT&T Mobility LLC ("ATTM") in this matter. Last Friday, we filed a motion for leave to file late a reply brief in support of ATTM's motion for a stay pending appeal. Docket Nos. 84 and 85. Earlier today, counsel for plaintiffs (H. Tim Hoffman, Esq.) informed me that plaintiffs do not oppose our motion for leave to file the reply brief. Respectfully submitted, /s Donald M. Falk Donald M. Falk cc: E-filing service list Mayer Brown LLP operates in combination with our associated English limited liability partnership and Hong Kong partnership (and its associated entities in Asia). Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?