United States of America v. Cathcart et al
Filing
249
AMENDED ORDER Granting In Part and Denying In Part Defendant HSIN'S Motion For Protective Order Limiting the Use of Deposition of HSIN re 192 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Chi-Hsiu Hsin. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 7/6/09. (fj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. CHARLES CATHCART, ET AL., Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff(s), Case No. C07-04762 PJH (JCS) AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT HSIN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER LIMITING THE USE OF DEPOSITION OF HSIN [Docket No. 192] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
On May 6, 2009, Defendant Charles Hsin filed a Motion for Protective Order Limiting the Use of Deposition of Charles Hsin to this Action (the "Motion"). On June 12, 2009, a telephonic hearing was held on the Motion. Nathan Clukey, counsel for Plaintiff, appeared. Edward O.C. Ord, counsel for Defendant Hsin, appeared. For reasons stated on the record, and good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the agreement of the parties, the deposition of Defendant Hsin may not be disclosed to persons or entities other than the parties to this litigation and their counsel, provided however that the deposition may be used in any penalty proceeding or litigation, including any administrative proceeding, that has been filed or may in the future be filed against any of the defendants herein pursuant to sections 6700 and 6701. Nothing in this Order shall be read in restrict the use of the Hsin deposition in this case or as a ruling on whether pleadings referencing or containing the Hsin deposition should be filed under seal. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 6, 2009
__________________________ JOSEPH C. SPERO United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?