United States of America v. Cathcart et al

Filing 338

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART re 313 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Randolph Anderson. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 9/29/9. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. CHARLES CATHCART, ET AL., Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff(s), Case No. C07-04762 PJH (JCS) ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER LIMITING USE OF DEPOSITION OF RECORDED STATEMENTS OF NON-PARTY WITNESS RANDOLPH ANDERSON TO THIS ACTION [Docket No. 313] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On September 8, 2009, Non-Party Witness Randolph Anderson filed a Motion for Protective Order Limiting Use of Deposition of Recorded Statements of Non-Party Witness Randolph Anderson to this Action. (the "Motion"). Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deposition of non-party witness Randolph Anderson may not be disclosed to persons or entities other than the parties to this litigation and their counsel, provided however that the deposition may be used in any penalty proceeding or litigation, including any administrative proceeding, that has been filed or may in the future be filed against any of the defendants herein pursuant to sections 6700 and 6701. Nothing in this Order shall be read in restrict the use of the Anderson deposition in this case or as a ruling on whether pleadings referencing or containing the Anderson deposition should be filed under seal. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 29, 2009 __________________________ JOSEPH C. SPERO United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?