Chapman v. San Francisco Newpaper Agency, et al.

Filing 42

ORDER REMOVING CASE FROM ASSISTED SETTLEMENT PROGRAM. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 8/31/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2009) Modified on 9/1/2009 (kc, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California Gregory Grant Chapman, Sr., Plaintiff in Propia Persona, v. San Francisco, Newspaper Agency, et al. Defendants. _____________________________________/ The above-entitled action was assigned to the Assisted Settlement Conference Program. Unfortunately, the court has been unable to locate special counsel for plaintiff through the program. Accordingly, the court now removes this case from the Assisted Settlement Conference Program. No. C07-4775 SBA ORDER REMOVING CASE FROM ASSISTED SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE PROGRAM 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Date 8/31/09 IT IS SO ORDERED. Saundra Brown Armstrong United States District Judge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHAPMAN et al, Plaintiff, v. SF CHRONICLE et al, Defendant. / Case Number: CV07-04775 SBA CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on August 31, 2009, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gregory Grant Chapman 870 River Rush Drive Sugar Hill, GA 30518 Dated: August 31, 2009 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?