Woodson v. Rodriguez et al

Filing 45

ORDER re 44 granting STIPULATION REQUESTING REFERRAL OF THIS CASE TO PRO SE SETTLEMENT PROGRAM WITH MAGISTRATE JUDGE NANDOR VADAS AND TO STAY PROCEEDINGS; ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas for Settlement.. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 7/1/09. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of California JAY C. RUSSELL Supervising Deputy Attorney General JOSE A. ZELIDON-ZEPEDA Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 227108 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Telephone: (415) 703-5781 Fax: (415) 703-5843 E-mail: Jose.ZelidonZepeda@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendants J. Rodriguez, M. Kircher, J. Parra, D. Vega, and E. Camarena IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION THOMAS RAY WOODSON, C 07-4925 CW (PR) Plaintiff, STIPULATION REQUESTING REFERRAL OF THIS CASE TO PRO SE SETTLEMENT PROGRAM WITH MAGISTRATE JUDGE NANDOR VADAS AND TO STAY PROCEEDINGS; ORDER Defendants. Judge The Honorable Claudia Wilken v. J. RODRIGUEZ, et al., The parties to this action jointly request, under Northern District Civil Local Rule 7-12, that the Court refer this case to the Pro Se Settlement Program with Magistrate Judge Nandor Vadas, in order to explore the possibility of settlement. The parties further request that the Court stay proceedings in this action, including all outstanding discovery, pending the outcome of the /// /// 1 Stip. Req. Referral to Med.; [Prop.] Ord. (C 07-4925) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 settlement conference. If the settlement conference proves unsuccessful, all responses to outstanding discovery shall be served 30 days after the settlement conference takes place. Defendants' motion for summary judgment shall be due 60 days after the settlement conference. Plaintiff's opposition shall be due 30 days after the motion for summary judgment is filed. Defendants may file a reply 30 days after the Plaintiff's opposition is filed. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Date: _________ ________________________________ Thomas Ray Woodson, Plaintiff in Pro se ________________________________ Jose A. Zelidon-Zepeda, Dep. Atty. Gen. Attorney for Defendants M. Kircher, J. Rodriguez, J. Parra, E. Camarena, and D. Vega Date:_________ PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 7/1/09 Date:_________ ________________________________ The Honorable Claudia Wilken United States District Judge SF2008200044 20201224.doc 2 Stip. Req. Referral to Med.; [Prop.] Ord. (C 07-4925) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA THOMAS RAY WOODSON, Plaintiff, v. J. RODRIGUEZ et al, Defendant. / Case Number: CV07-04925 CW CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on July 1, 2009, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. Thomas Ray Woodson P-76095 "C" Facility Calipatria State Prison P.O. Box 5001 Calipatria, CA 92253 Dated: July 1, 2009 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Sheilah Cahill, Deputy Clerk 3 Stip. Req. Referral to Med.; [Prop.] Ord. (C 07-4925)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?