Twinde v. Threshold Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al

Filing 67

ORDER re 66 granting STIPULATION EXTENDING PAGE LIMIT FOR DEFENDANTS' REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S CONSOLIDATED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 1/22/09. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2009)

Download PDF
1 MICHAEL L. CHARLSON (Bar No. 122125) 2 LAURENCE A. WEISS (Bar No. 164638) laweiss@hhlaw.com 3 4 5 6 7 mlcharlson@hhlaw.com J. CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL (Bar No. 215639) jcmitchell@hhlaw.com HOGAN & HARTSON LLP 525 University Avenue, 2nd Floor Palo Alto, California 94301 Telephone: +1 (650) 463-4000 Facsimile: +1 (650) 463-4199 THRESHOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., and JANET I. SWEARSON 8 Attorneys for Defendants 9 HAROLD E. "BARRY" SELICK 10 11 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) ) THRESHOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ) HAROLD E. "BARRY" SELICK and JANET I. ) SWEARSON ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________ ) RAYNOLD L. GILBERT, On Behalf of Himself ) and All Others Similarly Situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) THRESHOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ) HAROLD E. "BARRY" SELICK and JANET I. ) SWEARSON ) ) Defendants. ) Case No.: 4:07-CV-04972-CW CLASS ACTION STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMIT FOR DEFENDANTS' REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S CONSOLIDATED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT The Honorable Claudia Wilken 14 JERRY TWINDE, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMIT FOR DEFENDANTS' REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS - CASE NO. 4:07-CV-04972-CW \\\033594/000001 - 5729 v1 1 WHEREAS on September 19, 2008, lead plaintiff timely filed the Consolidated Second 2 Amended Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws (Dkt. No. 48), and 3 WHEREAS on November 14, 2008, defendants timely filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' 4 Consolidated Second Amended Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws ("Motion to 5 Dismiss") (Dkt. No. 56); and 6 WHEREAS on December 19, 2008, the Court entered a stipulated order providing that lead 7 plaintiff shall have 30 pages to respond to the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 62); and 8 WHEREAS on December 22, 2008, lead plaintiff timely filed an opposition to defendants' 9 Motion to Dismiss; and 10 WHEREAS, defendants believe that because of the number and complexity of the issues 11 raised in lead plaintiff's opposition to the Motion to Dismiss, defendants will need an additional 12 five pages for their reply brief to fully respond to lead plaintiff's arguments; and 13 WHEREAS, lead plaintiff does not oppose an extension of the page limit for defendants' 14 reply to 20 pages; 15 IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED by lead plaintiff and defendants, 16 through their respective counsel of record, that, subject to the Court's approval, defendants shall 17 have 20 pages for their reply brief in support of defendants' Motion to Dismiss. 18 19 SO STIPULATED. 20 21 DATED: January 22, 2009 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMIT FOR DEFENDANTS' REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS - CASE NO. 4:07-CV-04972-CW \\\033594/000001 - 5729 v1 HOGAN & HARTSON LLP By /s/ Laurence A. Weiss LAURENCE A. WEISS Attorneys for Defendants THRESHOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., HAROLD E. "BARRY" SELICK and JANET I. SWEARSON 1 DATED: January 22, 2009 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 100 Pine Street, Suite 2600 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 288-4545 Facsimile: (415) 288-4534 By /s/ Daniel J. Pfefferbaum DANIEL J. PFEFFERBAUM Attorneys for Lead Plaintiff *** I, Laurence A. Weiss, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 12 Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Extending Page Limit For Defendants' Reply Brief In Support 13 Of Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff's Consolidated Second Amended Complaint. In compliance with 14 General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Daniel J. Pfefferbaum has concurred in this filing. 15 16 17 18 19 20 *** ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, and good cause appearing, defendants shall have 20 /s/ Laurence A. Weiss LAURENCE A. WEISS 21 pages for their reply brief in support of defendants' Motion to Dismiss. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 1/22/09 ____________________________________________ HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Court Judge 25 DATED: ____________________ 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMIT FOR DEFENDANTS' REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS - CASE NO. 4:07-CV-04972-CW \\\033594/000001 - 5729 v1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?