Safeway Inc. et al v. Abbott Laboratories

Filing 117

ORDER re (213 in 4:07-cv-05985-CW) granting as modified STIPULATION and Application to Extend Motion to Dismiss Briefing Schedule by One Day in Light of Yom Kippur Holiday, (116 in 4:07-cv-05470-CW) (183 in 4:07-cv-05702-CW) (106 in 4:07-cv-06120-CW). Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 10/1/09. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James F. Hurst (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) David J. Doyle (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Samuel S. Park (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Stephanie S. McCallum (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 35 W. Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60601-9703 Telephone: (312) 558-5600 Facsimile: (312) 558-5700 Email: jhurst@winston.com; ddoyle@winston.com; spark@winston.com; smccallum@winston.com Nicole M. Norris (SBN 222785) WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 101 California Street, Suite 3900 San Francisco, CA 94111-5894 Telephone: 415-591-1000 Facsimile: 415-591-1400 Email: nnorris@winston.com Charles B. Klein (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Matthew A. Campbell (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 1700 K Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20007 Telephone: (202) 282-5000 Facsimile: (202) 282-5100 Email: cklein@winston.com Jeffrey I. Weinberger (SBN 56214) Stuart N. Senator (SBN 148009) David M. Rosenzweig (SBN 176272) MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 355 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560 Telephone: (213) 683-9100 Facsimile: (213) 687-3702 Email: jeffrey.weinberger@mto.com; stuart.senator@mto.com; david.rosenzweig@mto.com; Michelle Friedland (SBN 234124) MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 560 Mission Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2907 Telephone: (415) 512-4000 Facsimile: (415) 512-4077 Email: michelle.friedland@mto.com Attorneys for Defendant ABBOTT LABORATORIES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION SAFEWAY INC; WALGREEN CO.; THE KROGER CO.; NEW ALBERTSON'S, INC.; AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, INC.; AND HEB GROCERY COMPANY, LP, Plaintiffs, vs. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, Defendant. (Caption continued on next page) CASE NO. C 07-5470 (CW) Related per November 19, 2007 Order to Case No. C 04-1511(CW) ORDER RE STIPULATION AND APPLICATION TO EXTEND MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING SCHEDULE BY ONE DAY IN LIGHT OF YOM KIPPUR HOLIDAY Judge: Date: Time: Location: Honorable Claudia Wilken October 15, 2009 2:00 PM Courtroom 2 (4th Floor) 8921664.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NOS. 07-5470, 07-5985, 07-6120, 07-5702 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MEIJER, INC. & MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC.; ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC.; AND LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG COMPANY, INC., ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiffs, vs. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, Defendant. RITE AID CORPORATION; RITE AID HDQTRS CORP.; JCG (PJC) USA, LLC; MAXI DRUG, INC D/B/A BROOKS PHARMACY; ECKERD CORPORATION; CVS PHARMACY, INC.; AND CAREMARK LLC, Plaintiffs, vs. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, Defendant. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, d/b/a GLAXOSMITHKLINE, Plaintiff, vs. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, Defendant. CASE NO. C 07-5985 (CW) (Consolidated Cases) Related per November 30, 2007 Order to Case No. C 04-1511 (CW) CASE NO. C 07-6120 (CW) Related per December 5, 2007 Order to Case No. C 04-1511 (CW) CASE NO. C 07-5702 (CW) Related per December 5, 2007 Order to Case No. C 04-1511 (CW) 8921664.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NOS. 07-5470, 07-5985, 07-6120, 07-5702 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 8921664.1 ORDER The deadline for defendant Abbott Laboratories to file its motion to dismiss reply papers in the above-referenced cases is extended by one day, through and including October 2, 2009. The reply must be e-filed by noon that day. Dated: 10/1/09 Claudia Wilken United States District Judge -1- [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING SCHEDULE CASE NOS. 07-5470, 07-5985, 07-6120, 07-5702

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?