Safeway Inc. et al v. Abbott Laboratories

Filing 381

ORDER Granting (379 in 4:07-cv-05470-CW), (358 in 4:07-cv-06120-CW), (483 in 4:07-cv-05985-CW), (430 in 4:07-cv-05702-CW) Stipulation Adopting Procedure for Admitting Documents Into Evidence. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 3/1/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2011)

Download PDF
1 IRELL & MANELLA LLP Alexander F. Wiles (CA 73596) awiles@irell.com 2 Brian Hennigan (CA 86955) bhennigan@irell.com Trevor V. Stockinger (CA 226359) tstockinger@irell.com 3 S. Albert Wang (CA 250163) awang@irell.com 1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900 4 Los Angeles, California 90067-4276 Telephone: (310) 277-1010 5 Facsimile: (310) 203-7199 6 ARNOLD & PORTER LLP Kenneth A. Letzler (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Kenneth_Letzler@aporter.com 7 Daniel S. Pariser (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Daniel_Pariser@aporter.com Barbara H. Wootton (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Barbara Wootton@aporter.com 8 555 Twelfth Street, NW Washington, DC 20004-1206 Telephone: (202) 942-5000 9 Facsimile: (202) 942-5999 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff GlaxoSmithKline 11 [ADDITIONAL ATTORNEYS ON SIGNATURE PAGE] 12 13 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C07-5702 (CW) Related per November 19, 2007 Order to Case No. C-04-1511 (CW) STIPULATION AND ORDER ADOPTING PROCEDURE FOR ADMITTING DOCUMENTS INTO EVIDENCE Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: N/A N/A 2 (4th Floor) Hon. Claudia Wilken 16 SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION d/b/a/ GLAXOSMITHKLINE, 17 Plaintiff, 18 v. 19 ABBOTT LABORATORIES, 20 Defendant. 21 22 23 24 25 (Caption continued on next page.) 26 27 28 2388288 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ADOPTING PROCEDURE FOR ADMITTING DOCUMENTS INTO EVIDENCE (CASE NOS. C 07-5702, C 07-5470, C 07-5985, C 07-6120) 1 SAFEWAY INC., et al 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) ABBOTT LABORATORIES , ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MEIJER, INC. & MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, ) INC., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) ABBOTT LABORATORIES , ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) RITE AID CORPORATION, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) ABBOTT LABORATORIES , ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C07-5470 (CW) Related per November 19, 2007 Order to Case No. C-04-1511 (CW) STIPULATION AND ORDER ADOPTING PROCEDURE FOR ADMITTING DOCUMENTS INTO EVIDENCE Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: N/A N/A 2 (4th Floor) Hon. Claudia Wilken Case No. C07-5985 (CW) Related per November 3, 2007 Order to Case No. C-04-1511 (CW) STIPULATION AND ORDER ADOPTING PROCEDURE FOR ADMITTING DOCUMENTS INTO EVIDENCE Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: N/A N/A 2 (4th Floor) Hon. Claudia Wilken Case No. C07-6120 (CW) Related per December 5, 2007 Order to Case No. C-04-1511 (CW) STIPULATION AND ORDER ADOPTING PROCEDURE FOR ADMITTING DOCUMENTS INTO EVIDENCE Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: N/A N/A 2 (4th Floor) Hon. Claudia Wilken 2388288 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ADOPTING PROCEDURE FOR ADMITTING DOCUMENTS INTO EVIDENCE (CASE NOS. C 07-5702, C 07-5470, C 07-5985, C 07-6120) 1 WHEREAS, the parties wish to facilitate the efficiency of the trial beginning on February 2 28, 2011; 3 WHEREAS, the parties believe the following procedure for admitting documents into 4 evidence would be convenient and efficient for both the parties and the Court; 5 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED: 6 1. Any document that was identified by the parties as a common exhibit or a sub-list 7 exhibit as those terms are defined in the January 21, 2011 Stipulation and Order Regarding 8 Parties' Proposed Exhibit List and Deposition Designations, e.g., Case No. 07-5702, Dkt. # 328, 9 and that was not excluded pursuant to an order of the Court based on the parties' joint brief filed 10 February 24, 2011, e.g., Case No. 07-5702, Dkt. # 426, shall be admissble. 11 2. An exhibit referenced in paragraph 1 will be admitted into evidence unless (a) it is 12 not used with a witness; or (b) it is an exhibit falling within Paragraph 4 of the January 21, 2011 13 Stipulation and Order, and the Court sustained an objection to admissibility of the document. 14 3. On a daily basis, the parties will jointly coordinate with the courtroom clerk and/or 15 court reporter following the close of testimony to check that the joint list of exhibits admitted each 16 day is accurately maintained. 17 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD: 18 /s/ Alexander F. Wiles Alexander F. Wiles 20 IRELL & MANELLA LLP 1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900 21 Los Angeles, CA 90067-4276 19 22 Counsel for GSK 23 /s/ Scott E. Perwin Scott E. Perwin 25 KENNY NACHWALTER, PA 1100 Miami Center 26 201 South Biscayne Blvd. Miami, FL 33131 27 Counsel for Safeway Inc., et al. 28 24 -12388288 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ADOPTING PROCEDURE FOR ADMITTING DOCUMENTS INTO EVIDENCE (CASE NOS. C 07-5702, C 07-5470, C 07-5985, C 07-6120) /s/ Stephanie S. McCallum Stephanie S. McCallum WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 35 W. Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60601 Counsel for Abbott Laboratories __ _/s/ Brendan Glackin_________ Brendan Glackin LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP Embarcadero Center West 275 Battery Street, 30th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 Counsel for Customer Class Plaintiffs 1 /s/ Monica L. Rebuck Monica L. Rebuck 3 HANGLEY ARONCHICK SEGAL & PUDLIN 4 30 N. Third Street, Suite 700 Harrisburg, PA 17101 5 Counsel for Rite Aid Corp., et al. 6 2 7 Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X, I attest under penalty of perjury that 8 concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the above signatories. 9 Dated: February 26, 2011 10 11 12 13 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 14 Dated: 3/1/2011 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -22388288 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ADOPTING PROCEDURE FOR ADMITTING DOCUMENTS INTO EVIDENCE (CASE NOS. C 07-5702, C 07-5470, C 07-5985, C 07-6120) /s/ Sarah R. London Sarah R. London LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN Counsel for Customer Plaintiffs Judge Claudia Wilken United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?